Re: Review Request 129339: Allow building kwalletd against gpgme++ from gpgme 1.7

2016-11-05 Thread Antonio Rojas
> On Nov. 5, 2016, 10:39 a.m., Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > > kwalletd/CMakeLists.txt, line 8 > > > > > > Please do this in reverse logic, same as in the kwallet.git commit you > > are referring to - that means

Re: Review Request 129339: Allow building kwalletd against gpgme++ from gpgme 1.7

2016-11-05 Thread Antonio Rojas
> On Nov. 5, 2016, 10:30 p.m., Sandro Knauß wrote: > > these two changes look unreleaded to the patch. No, these are required because they were pulled indirectly by kdepimlibs' gpgme++, but not by gpgme's one. - Antonio --- This is an

Re: Review Request 129339: Allow building kwalletd against gpgme++ from gpgme 1.7

2016-11-05 Thread Sandro Knauß
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129339/#review100616 --- these two changes look unreleaded to the patch.

Re: Review Request 129339: Allow building kwalletd against gpgme++ from gpgme 1.7

2016-11-05 Thread Sandro Knauß
> On Nov. 5, 2016, 10:39 a.m., Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > > kwalletd/CMakeLists.txt, line 8 > > > > > > Please do this in reverse logic, same as in the kwallet.git commit you > > are referring to - that means

Re: Review Request 128659: Proofread/update kfind docbooks

2016-11-05 Thread Burkhard Lück
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128659/ --- (Updated Nov. 5, 2016, 10:01 nachm.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 129339: Allow building kwalletd against gpgme++ from gpgme 1.7

2016-11-05 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
> On Nov. 5, 2016, 10:39 a.m., Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > > kwalletd/CMakeLists.txt, line 8 > > > > > > Please do this in reverse logic, same as in the kwallet.git commit you > > are referring to - that means

Re: Review Request 129339: Allow building kwalletd against gpgme++ from gpgme 1.7

2016-11-05 Thread Antonio Rojas
> On Nov. 5, 2016, 10:39 a.m., Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > > kwalletd/CMakeLists.txt, line 8 > > > > > > Please do this in reverse logic, same as in the kwallet.git commit you > > are referring to - that means

Re: kio-gdrive - was - Re: New project moved to review

2016-11-05 Thread Elvis Angelaccio
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dilluns, 31 d’octubre de 2016, a les 17:39:21 CET, Elvis Angelaccio va > escriure: >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> > El divendres, 28 d’octubre de 2016, a les 18:21:48 CET,

Re: K3b 2.10.0 Applications/16.12

2016-11-05 Thread Leslie Zhai
Hi KDE Core, Can K3b go to kdemultimedia module? please give me some advice, thanks a lot! On 2016年11月04日 07:46, Albert Astals Cid wrote: El dijous, 3 de novembre de 2016, a les 11:03:44 CET, Leslie Zhai va escriure: 在 2016年11月03日 07:42, Albert Astals Cid 写道: El dimecres, 2 de novembre de

Re: Review Request 129339: Allow building kwalletd against gpgme++ from gpgme 1.7

2016-11-05 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129339/#review100593 --- kwalletd/CMakeLists.txt (line 8)

Review Request 129340: Make building drkonqi optional

2016-11-05 Thread Antonio Rojas
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129340/ --- Review request for KDE Runtime and Rex Dieter. Repository: kde-runtime

Review Request 129339: Allow building kwalletd against gpgme++ from gpgme 1.7

2016-11-05 Thread Antonio Rojas
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129339/ --- Review request for KDE Runtime and Andreas Sturmlechner. Repository: