On Sunday 26 December 2010, Andriy Rysin wrote:
Commenting out two deprecated methods helped but that's probably a wrong
solution.
We really do need reliable nightly and/or continuous builds if we seriously
want to support the different profiles and platforms.
I have a dashboard for each KDE
On Monday 29 November 2010, David Faure wrote:
On Monday 09 August 2010, Volker Krause wrote:
On Saturday 07 August 2010 02:24:16 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On August 6, 2010, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Side comment: shouldn't all of this (the includes and the
installation rules) be
On Friday 19 November 2010, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
hi all...
because we need to get this going, i've started a wiki page for a currently
theoretical dev sprint for the KDE Platform (kdelibs + kdebase-runtime,
primarily) for spring 2011:
http://community.kde.org/KDE_Core/Platform_11
On Wednesday 10 November 2010, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Em Quarta-feira 10 Novembro 2010, às 10:37:57, Mark Kretschmann escreveu:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Thiago Macieira thi...@kde.org wrote:
D-Bus community is proposing to do away with the session bus and
replace it with a user
On Monday 01 November 2010, Michael Jansen wrote:
it could work out great, it could be a disaster, it could be a lot of
work for a little gain ... we just can't tell right now because it's
nothing more than a vague idea.
you really can't plan the future of core assets like that.
But
On Sunday 31 October 2010, todd rme wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Michael Jansen
k...@michael-jansen.bizwrote:
...
1. Small improvements to the Qt Libraries
Those are the so called convenient classes. Classes the have been added
to the
KDE Libs because of some shortcomings
On Sunday 31 October 2010, Juan Carlos Torres wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Cornelius Schumacher
schumac...@kde.orgwrote:
KDE would still create great applications based on Qt, just as we do now,
but
without the additional layering of the KDE libraries on top of Qt.
snip
301 - 307 of 307 matches
Mail list logo
