Re: Croutons in kdereview

2021-10-27 Thread Kevin Ottens
sed into QML as a JavaScript Thennable (similarly to Qt IVI's > > PendingReply) and headers for C++20 coroutine integration for the > > Croutons Future types + some Qt types that make sense to co_await. > > > > The library is largely headers-only, sans the FutureBase, which has

Re: Koko in KDEReview

2021-05-05 Thread Kevin Ottens
with you if you pop by in the chatroom (#kde-vdg). A long time ago in a gal... well... a long time ago, we had something called KBugBuster. Was probably a bit too much bugzilla and triaging focused. Looks like it completely disappeared though, didn't find trace of its code. Cheers. PS: I warne

Re: KF6 online sprint: March 27-28

2021-03-24 Thread Kevin Ottens
illing the other slots. ;-) Regards. -- Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net enioka Haute Couture - proud patron of KDE, https://hc.enioka.com/en signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: KCGroups in KDEreview

2021-03-02 Thread Kevin Ottens
ser > user.slice/user-1000.slice/user@1000.service/app.slice -> UserApps > user.slice/user-1000.slice/user@1000.service/session.slice -> UserSession > user.slice/user-1000.slice/user@1000.service/background.slice -> > UserBackground Sounds good to me. Let's go for this. Re

Re: KDE Frameworks 6 - Virtual Sprint setup

2021-01-30 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Saturday, 30 January 2021 12:14:27 CET Volker Krause wrote: > Thanks for driving this, I'm in! European hours preferred, any weekend > starting from w6 should be possible. Same here, not before week 10 or even better not before week 13. Cheers. -- Kevin Ottens

Re: KCGroups in KDEreview

2020-12-14 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Sunday, 13 December 2020 22:41:24 CET David Edmundson wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 11:48 AM Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Thursday, 3 December 2020 12:15:52 CET David Edmundson wrote: > > > Ultimately this isn't really dealing with cgroups direc

Re: KCGroups in KDEreview

2020-12-03 Thread Kevin Ottens
nt. Got a similar question though, which other unit types would be useful to control? Reason being that API wise I'd smell an enum for something like this. Regards. -- Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: KCGroups in KDEreview

2020-11-29 Thread Kevin Ottens
ts IMHO, often those manual tests end up used as examples by people and having better readability helps (also avoids having people copying and pasting shameful things). ;-) That's not much but I'm obviously biased by the fact that we discussed this API together already. :-) Regards. -- Kevin Ot

Re: Kup in KDE Review

2020-04-14 Thread Kevin Ottens
plans as > they want and each will have some settings. By the sound of it you might want to look into parameterized groups: https://api.kde.org/frameworks/kconfig/html/kconfig_compiler.html This feature has been there forever but is often overlooked. Regards. -- Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad

Re: Possible to move some KF5 frameworks to invent?

2019-08-13 Thread Kevin Ottens
an set extra rules based on such a wildcards scheme. Beside, this would put some order to that naming going forward, I see that as a bonus. Regards. -- Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net enioka Haute Couture - proud patron of KDE, https://hc.enioka.com/en signature.asc Descr

Re: Possible to move some KF5 frameworks to invent?

2019-08-12 Thread Kevin Ottens
genuinely surprised about that claim. Are we sure that it's not a setting on our instance forcing this? I'm currently working on a project where you can force push in non-protected branches without your own fork. Regards. -- Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net enioka Haute Couture - p

Re: kaudiocreator to unmaintained

2019-06-20 Thread Kevin Ottens
ths which kind of de facto makes him maintainer. ;-) Since I'd rather we have one project with a team size > 1 that two with a team size of 1, I'll retract my previous offer of reviving kaudiocreator and turn my attention to audex instead. Hopefully we can get it out of playground and into KDE Applica

Re: kaudiocreator to unmaintained

2019-05-22 Thread Kevin Ottens
s4support. > > Has anyone attempted to port away from it? Not yet, but definitely something I want to tackle soon-ish. Regards. -- Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: kaudiocreator to unmaintained

2019-05-21 Thread Kevin Ottens
, it's been eons since I had anything in the regular applications collection. Could someone refresh me on what it entails to "make release"? Back in the day it was fairly transparent, if that's still so low on work I can easily say yes... if not I'll have to evaluate. Regards. -- Ke

Re: kaudiocreator to unmaintained

2019-05-14 Thread Kevin Ottens
ses in KF5 time > > > > Obsolete technology > > Copying also the last maintainer. In fact I have one local commit which I forgot to push... from Dec 2017. I wanted to brush it up a bit and have it released again. Yes, I buy CDs and rip them to mp3 or flac. Call me old school.

Re: CI system maintainability

2019-03-29 Thread Kevin Ottens
e, etc.). Regards. -- Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: CI system maintainability

2019-03-29 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Friday, 29 March 2019 09:43:44 CET Volker Krause wrote: > On Friday, 29 March 2019 08:59:59 CET Kevin Ottens wrote: > > On Thursday, 28 March 2019 21:53:06 CET Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > > Having mandatory reviews for a central and complex component like > &g

Re: CI system maintainability

2019-03-29 Thread Kevin Ottens
lso a technical issue. Akonadi makes things > complicated (and it's already 13 years old, so it should be mature in the > meantime). Yes, it's byzantine really. And the user experience is still not great (to be polite), had to setup some new hardware recently and I was honestly almost to the point of throwing it all through the window. Regards. -- Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: CI system maintainability

2019-03-28 Thread Kevin Ottens
I in PIM components. Although it's clear from the kde-pim list that the CI is making a lot of noise there. Either we collectively became too good at ignoring those emails, or it's too verbose (after all it's one email per component per build type, it piles up quickly). Regards. -- Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: CI system maintainability

2019-03-28 Thread Kevin Ottens
de..." And this is true, writing code will create bugs, that's why responsible people like safety nets even to the price of throughput. Now can we use a more adult tone again? Maybe re-read Dan's email again who has a more balanced view despite being in a similar situation? Regards. -- Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: CI system maintainability

2019-03-28 Thread Kevin Ottens
> especially important for projects like PIM, where most of us contribute at > work in between waiting for CI and replying to 15 Slack threads or in the > evening after a long day And this too of course. I fully support this message. ;-) Cheers. -- Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsqua

Re: CI system maintainability

2019-03-28 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Thursday, 28 March 2019 10:35:37 CET Luca Beltrame wrote: > In data giovedì 28 marzo 2019 10:32:39 CET, Kevin Ottens ha scritto: > > OK, to be fair not 100% today's situation because of the above. It was > > based on best judgment maybe we're missing such a set o

Re: CI system maintainability

2019-03-28 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Thursday, 28 March 2019 10:08:54 CET Luca Beltrame wrote: > In data giovedì 28 marzo 2019 09:50:47 CET, Kevin Ottens ha scritto: > > I'd argue we're loosing more with the current state of PIM than we'd loose > > with mandatory reviews. > > Perhaps, instead of an al

Re: CI system maintainability

2019-03-28 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Thursday, 28 March 2019 09:41:29 CET Luca Beltrame wrote: > In data giovedì 28 marzo 2019 09:29:22 CET, Kevin Ottens ha scritto: > > at your screen or pair with you" in the past. Clearly this compromise gets > > somewhat exploited and that's especially bad in t

Re: CI system maintainability

2019-03-28 Thread Kevin Ottens
.. I know it's unpopular in KDE, and I advocated for "don't force a tool if you can get someone to look at your screen or pair with you" in the past. Clearly this compromise gets somewhat exploited and that's especially bad in the case of a fragile and central component like KDE PIM.

Re: Importing kdiff3 - was - Re: Aw: Re: KDE inclusion

2018-01-25 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Thursday, 25 January 2018 22:35:37 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dijous, 25 de gener de 2018, a les 9:01:10 CET, Kevin Ottens va escriure: > > On Thursday, 25 January 2018 00:08:03 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > As I did with the last person that also was co

Re: Importing kdiff3 - was - Re: Aw: Re: KDE inclusion

2018-01-25 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Thursday, 25 January 2018 00:08:03 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dimecres, 24 de gener de 2018, a les 17:34:16 CET, Kevin Funk va escriure: > > On Wednesday, 24 January 2018 16:24:10 CET Michael Reeves wrote: > > > A little confused on where to start with this sponsor thing. > > >

Re: Reviving KAudioCreator

2017-12-27 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Tuesday, 26 December 2017 23:18:00 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote: > One kind-of-big bug i'd like fixed is that it doesn't realize the encoder > command line is not there, i was waiting for like 5 minutes wondering why it > took so much to encode until i realized that i don't actaully have

Re: Reviving KAudioCreator

2017-12-22 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Friday, 22 December 2017 10:59:55 CET Boudhayan Gupta wrote: > I did a little work on KCompactDisc about two years ago (and also > looked at KAudioCreator), and then realised it hadn't been working for > a long time. [...] I think it was due to the audiocd kio not being available in

Reviving KAudioCreator

2017-12-22 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello all, I happen to be one of those poor souls who still rip CDs from time to time. I'm using Dolphin for that right now, but I miss the convenience of using KAudioCreator a while back. It looks like it's not released at all anymore. After a quick glance at the repository, it seems to be

Re: KDE Review: Rust Qt Binding Generator

2017-09-04 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Monday, 4 September 2017 09:43:46 CEST Jos van den Oever wrote: > Op maandag 4 september 2017 07:46:28 CEST schreef Kevin Ottens: > > On Sunday, 3 September 2017 18:14:49 CEST Jos van den Oever wrote: > > > [...] > > > The idea of this binding generator

Re: KDE Review: Rust Qt Binding Generator

2017-09-03 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Sunday, 3 September 2017 18:14:49 CEST Jos van den Oever wrote: > [...] > The idea of this binding generator is that you write each part in the most > appropriate language. Rust bindings for Qt are hard to get right and will > still have caveats for a while. With this generator, you

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

2017-07-19 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Sunday, 2 July 2017 12:33:47 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El diumenge, 2 de juliol de 2017, a les 1:58:52 CEST, Kevin Ottens va > > It's been a week now without objection or further change requests. It's > > been in kdereview for three weeks now. Shall we more t

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

2017-07-02 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Sunday, 2 July 2017 13:52:48 CEST Sandro Knauß wrote: > > 2) the third one (libkdepim) I'm forbidden to link against since it's > > private API to kdepim (turned into a dumping ground apparently...). > > > > Obviously, as soon as libkdepim is cleaned up (which I regularly hear it's > >

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

2017-07-01 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Sunday, 25 June 2017 14:00:05 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Thursday, 8 June 2017 09:36:51 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > > OK, this time it's the right one. :-) > > > > Zanshin is now in kdereview and aiming for extragear/pim. Please review > > away! > >

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

2017-06-25 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Thursday, 8 June 2017 09:36:51 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > OK, this time it's the right one. :-) > > Zanshin is now in kdereview and aiming for extragear/pim. Please review > away! > > Thanks in advance. So I pushed just now all the patches mentioned in this t

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

2017-06-23 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Friday, 23 June 2017 16:11:12 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > On Friday, 23 June 2017 16:08:31 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > > On Tuesday, 20 June 2017 22:14:33 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > > > On Monday, 19 June 2017 21:50:16 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > > > > [...

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

2017-06-23 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Tuesday, 20 June 2017 22:14:33 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Monday, 19 June 2017 21:50:16 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > > [...] > > I'm not sure why you didn't like the above solution. > > Just more work over time, and I don't have the bandwidth ATM. Typically we &

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

2017-06-21 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Saturday, 10 June 2017 15:08:36 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Thursday, 8 June 2017 13:03:35 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > If I stop Akonadi it silently stops working, an error message might be > > informative. > > I'll see what can be done, I'll need to in

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

2017-06-20 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Monday, 19 June 2017 21:50:16 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > Kevin Ottens ha scritto: > > On Monday, 19 June 2017 18:56:39 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > >> On Monday, 19 June 2017 18:50:23 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > >>> On Tuesday, 13 June 2017 00:07:0

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

2017-06-20 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Monday, 19 June 2017 23:11:09 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > That makes no sense, the kxmlgui code will call i18n(), so you need to have > it in a .mo file not on a .ts file. Fair enough, I abandoned that patch, did another one to switch to i18n everywhere instead:

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

2017-06-20 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Monday, 19 June 2017 21:49:26 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:36:39PM +0200, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Looks like I just didn't clone at the right time. > > > > That said, there's something fishy with the signature: > > http

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

2017-06-19 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Monday, 19 June 2017 18:56:39 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > On Monday, 19 June 2017 18:50:23 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > > On Tuesday, 13 June 2017 00:07:01 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > Have you read the page that speaks about how to write Messages.sh files? >

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

2017-06-19 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Monday, 12 June 2017 16:48:26 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > On 10 June 2017 at 14:08, Kevin Ottens <er...@kde.org> wrote: > >> You have a release script in scripts/release.sh, consider using > >> kde:releaseme as extracting translations can be quite faffy

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

2017-06-19 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Tuesday, 13 June 2017 00:07:01 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Have you read the page that speaks about how to write Messages.sh files? > It's quite good. Please read it and explain what you don't understand. It's more that I don't quite see clearly the distribution of the .po and such

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

2017-06-10 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Thursday, 8 June 2017 22:12:10 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Sincerely i'd just suggest to kill the 3rdparty folder altogether, if you're > concerned about people not being able to compile your thing you're better > server just providing an appimage/snap/flatpack. It's more that: 1)

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

2017-06-10 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Thursday, 8 June 2017 19:24:54 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dijous, 8 de juny de 2017, a les 9:36:51 CEST, Kevin Ottens va escriure: > > OK, this time it's the right one. :-) > > > > Zanshin is now in kdereview and aiming for extragear/pim. Please review &

Re: Zanshin is in kdereview

2017-06-10 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Thursday, 8 June 2017 13:03:35 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > There's some GPL 2 only files in 3rdparty/kdepim, if they are used it > means the applications can only be copied as GPL 2, consider > contacting the copyright holders to fix this as it doesn't match the > rest of the source.

Zanshin is in kdereview

2017-06-08 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, OK, this time it's the right one. :-) Zanshin is now in kdereview and aiming for extragear/pim. Please review away! Thanks in advance. Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com signature.asc Description: This is a

Re: zanshin for kdereview

2017-06-06 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Tuesday, 6 June 2017 11:29:00 CEST Aleix Pol wrote: > On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Kevin Ottens <er...@kde.org> wrote: > > Zanshin has been around for a while and I should have requested it to move > > to Extragear a long time ago but somehow forgot. The

zanshin for kdereview

2017-06-03 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, Zanshin has been around for a while and I should have requested it to move to Extragear a long time ago but somehow forgot. The discussion regarding the next gen CI reminded me of that. I hereby request Zanshin to be moved out of playground and into kdereview so that it gets the usual

Re: Next Gen CI Will Be Moving to Production Shortly: Upcoming Changes

2017-05-06 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Saturday, 6 May 2017 11:37:51 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > Which brings me to the third point of attention. We'll only be adding > projects to the Next Gen CI system at their request going forward. For > Frameworks, Applications and Plasma this is something which we're > essentially

Re: Fwd: Plasma Mobile Components -> Kirigami (?)

2016-03-01 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:30:23 CET Marco Martin wrote: > [...] > right now They are called Plasma mobile components, but the concern is > that "it depends on plasma", it's intended just to be used on plasma, > but that's not true. > Another name was proposed: Kirigami, below the

Phabricator: Make it happen already!

2015-08-26 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello all, So we've been evaluating different options to modernize our tooling, and for some reason it looks like we're still waiting on some external pressure to pick one. I'll then try to be this external pressure with this war cry: Phaaab! Make it happen already! It is basically what I

Re: [Kde-pim] The Future or KDE PIM Releases

2015-04-14 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Tuesday 14 April 2015 09:44:19 Sandro Knauß wrote: What's meant by KDE Accounts? well we also had a look into the code. It is a resource that will adds all local users from kde to your kaddressbook. Oooh, that one... it's very important to me, I rely a lot on it. Can we release

Re: Build dependency issues with kdesrc-build

2015-02-06 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Friday 06 February 2015 15:11:22 Kevin Funk wrote: On Thursday 05 February 2015 22:16:54 Michael Pyne wrote: kdesrc-build will reorder modules into the right build order (assuming the needed metadata in kde-build-metadata is present). However as of now it only reorders modules

Re: Another proposal for modernization of our infrastructure

2015-02-03 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, First of all, thank you Boud for the wise words. On Tuesday 03 February 2015 11:17:59 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Mon, 2 Feb 2015, Milian Wolff wrote: Sigh, I find it highly sad to read this over and over again. Well, this whole discussion makes me extremely sad. What people have to

Re: Sysadmin report on the modernization of our infrastructure

2015-01-21 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Wednesday 21 January 2015 17:12:07 Ben Cooksley wrote: As promised in the earlier thread, i'd like to present the sysadmin report on the state of the infrastructure surrounding our code. It contains a detailed summary of what is broken with our existing systems, why change is

Re: Changes to branch management

2014-12-24 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Wednesday 24 December 2014 13:57:15 Ben Cooksley wrote: Unfortunately i'm not sure if Gitolite's ACL mechanisms let us differentiate between tags and branches so if we allow anyone to delete branches they'll probably be able to do the same for tags. Then it's definitely something to pay

Re: Changes to our Git infrastructure

2014-12-24 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Wednesday 24 December 2014 00:20:18 Ben Cooksley wrote: Before we go ahead and jump to a new platform though - we need to know what we want. Can everyone please suggest what they think are the things they'd like to see feature wise? Review wise, I'd like to be able to review full

Re: Using Gerrit for code review in KDE

2014-09-10 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Tuesday 09 September 2014 20:02:55 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: In any case, can you see the inconsistency between saying we need highly active repos to find pain points and these projects will only use it on an opt-in basis, and not even for all patches? You may as well throw a more lightly

Retiring and testament

2014-09-09 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello dear KDE contributors, I'm sending this from Akademy 2014. Our KDE Frameworks BoF is now over, as usual we did great progress: https://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Meetings/201409Akademy Also I put in place the goals for the months to come before coming:

Re: Using Gerrit for code review in KDE

2014-09-09 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, OK, I guess there might be some misunderstanding or at least partial information due to live meeting vs short announcement on list. On Tuesday 09 September 2014 17:39:54 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: On Tuesday, September 9, 2014 16.59:35 Jan Kundrát wrote: On Tuesday, 9 September 2014

Re: Solid BoF at Akademy

2014-08-13 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Wednesday 13 August 2014 12:15:18 Jan Grulich wrote: I would like to inform that we decided to arrange a Solid BoF at Akademy on Tuesday in the second room after lunch. If you are interested in Solid stuff, including Plasma Networkmanagement, KScreen, Powerdevil, Bluedevil etc. you

Re: code guideline

2014-07-09 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Wednesday 09 July 2014 10:15:03 David Faure wrote: On Saturday 28 June 2014 08:51:42 Rodrigo Bonifacio wrote: Dear all, is there any code guideline that recommends developers to avoid the use of exception handling mechanisms within the core libraries of KDE? I don't think it's written

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w28

2014-07-08 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 28 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: agateau, apol, d_ed, dfaure, fregl, mgraesslin, notmart, PovAddict, Riddell, sandsmark, tosky, unormal, vHanda and myself. Announcements: * KF 5.0 got

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w28

2014-07-08 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Tuesday 08 July 2014 18:27:52 John Layt wrote: Here's a bit of bike-shedding for you: when creating completely new Frameworks in Tier 1, do we name them with a Q or with a K or with something completely neutral? Not really a bike-shedding topic hopefully... We had the case already and we

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w28

2014-07-08 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Wednesday 09 July 2014 09:57:27 Ben Cooksley wrote: On 9 July 2014 03:30, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote: * ervin hopes to see kdepimlibs bits getting in sooner rather than later; Hmm? Sysadmin has already received a request to get the frameworks branch of kdepimlibs building

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w25

2014-06-17 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 25 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: agateau, apol, mgraesslin and myself. * agateau did some kapidox fixes on api.kde.org; * he also fixed a crash in KCMultiDialog; * he also proposed

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w20

2014-05-13 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 20 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, agateau, alexmerry, arichardson, PovAddict, Riddell, sebas, shadeslayer, teo and myself. * afiestas has been working on the async powermanagement

KDE Frameworks: There will be a beta 3

2014-05-05 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello all, After the release of beta 2, we realized that it couldn't be the last beta for several reasons: * a long standing release blocker in libsolid still wasn't addressed in time for beta 2, it'll hopefully be solved in the next few days, otherwise we'll put in place a contingency plan;

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w18

2014-04-29 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 18 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, agateau, apol, dfaure, notmart, PovAddict, Riddell, shadeslayer, tosky, teo, vHanda and myself Announcement: * Beta 2 to be tagged end of this

KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

2014-04-27 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello framework maintainers, As you know we're getting near the final release. If we don't hit a critical issue, we'll release the final early June. Before that, we'll have a second beta on May 4th, and we'd like it to look as close to the final as possible. That's why I'm sending you this

KDE Frameworks Release Cycle

2014-04-27 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello people, As you may have noticed, we're covering quite a few tasks here during the sprint. But, we're also having discussion topics, and the most important one we covered is the release cycle. Indeed, we got the question several times already of once 5.0 is out what will happen? It is

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w16

2014-04-15 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 16 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, agateau, alexmerry, apol, notmart, tosky and myself Announcement: * I won't be around next week for the meeting, Riddell will run the one next

Re: Default bugzilla asignees for frameworks

2014-04-15 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Tuesday 15 April 2014 17:07:38 Martin Klapetek wrote: Hey, As we now have people stepping up as frameworks maintainers, I think part of that maintainership should be becoming the default assignee for given framework on bugzilla. For example I filed a bug against KIO and that was

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w15

2014-04-08 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 15 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: agateau, apol, mck182, notmart, tosky and myself. * agateau put more work on translation support for Qt-based frameworks; * he fixed string extraction from

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w14

2014-04-01 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 14 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, agateau, alexmerry, apol, notmart, Riddell, tosky and myself. * afiestas will push the branch with removed interfaces; * he's first making sure

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w13

2014-03-25 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 13 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, agateau, alexmerry, apol, arichardson, mgraesslin, notmart, PovAddict, tosky and myself. Announcement: * Beta1 will be tagged on Friday (so no

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w12

2014-03-18 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 12 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, agateau, alexmerry, apol, dfaure, mck182, mgraesslin, notmart, PovAddict, Riddell, svuorela, tosky and myself. * afiestas reminds everybody to

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w11

2014-03-11 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 10 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, agateau, alexmerry, dfaure, mgraesslin, notmart, sebas, teo, tosky and myself. Announcement: * Beta 1 will be tagged on March 28 instead of April

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w10

2014-03-05 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Thursday 06 March 2014 02:13:36 Valentin Rusu wrote: Catching up with KF5 progress... On Tuesday, March 04, 2014 04:59:58 PM Kevin Ottens wrote: * Repository merges for kwallet and kdnssd still reported as pending... What's that? Is that about merging 4.xx repository

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w9

2014-02-25 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 9 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: alexmerry, dfaure, krake, mgraesslin, teo, tosky and myself. Announcement: * Alpha 2 will be prepared on saturday; * Please push toward completion of the

Re: Changing the KDE Edu module maintainer

2014-02-21 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Thursday 20 February 2014 15:25:22 Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote: Best regards to all and thanks to everyone for what you brought me so far. Well, thanks to *you* for what you brought to everyone in the community so far. And of course, feel free to stop by any of the Toulouse Hacking

Re: Review Request 115695: Rework KNotification to work without KNotify daemon

2014-02-20 Thread Kevin Ottens
agree with Aleix I'd like it to be closer to the target with less regressions before letting it in. You still have a few days. ;-) Also don't forget to update the yaml and the list of frameworks in the wiki, it's moving in tier 3 territory AFAICT. - Kevin Ottens On Feb. 13, 2014, 10:14 a.m

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w7

2014-02-11 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 6 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, agateau, alexmerry, apol, dfaure, dgilo, krake, mgraesslin, Riddell, teo, tosky and myself. Announcement: * Alpha 1 still not published; * Please

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w4

2014-01-21 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 3 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, agateau, alexmerry, arichardson, dfaure, mgraesslin, Riddell, tosky and myself. Announcement: * Come on people, we're still short on maintainers!

Re: KDE Frameworks: Looking for maintainers

2014-01-19 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, I thought it'd be interesting to some to get updated stats since my last call to arms. On Monday 13 January 2014 19:40:54 Kevin Ottens wrote: This is a reminder that we're still looking for maintainers for our frameworks. Out of the 57 existing frameworks 25 have no maintainer (yes

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w3

2014-01-14 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 3 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, agateau, alexmerry, dfaure, mck182, Riddell, valir and myself. Announcement: * We're *still* actively looking for maintainers! Konqi wants YOU!

KDE Frameworks: Looking for maintainers

2014-01-13 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello everyone, This is a reminder that we're still looking for maintainers for our frameworks. Out of the 57 existing frameworks 33 have no maintainer (yes, that's almost 60%). I don't know about you, but I find that worrying. The modules without maintainers are spread this way: - 9 are tier

Re: KDE Frameworks: Moving toward 5.0 final and Governance

2014-01-08 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Wednesday 08 January 2014 10:56:41 John Layt wrote: On 8 January 2014 07:17, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote: For the record, if that depends on QtPrintSupport it can't make it to KGuiAddons (which should depend only on QtCore and QtGui). Good point :-) I'm fine keeping it even

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w2

2014-01-07 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 48 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, agateau, alexmerry, apol, d_ed, mck182, mgraesslin, Riddell, sandsmark, sebas, svuorela and myself. Announcement: * Happy new year! * TP1 is

Re: KDE Frameworks: Moving toward 5.0 final and Governance

2014-01-07 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Tuesday 07 January 2014 07:22:01 Kevin Ottens wrote: On Tuesday 07 January 2014 00:45:19 Christoph Feck wrote: On Monday 06 January 2014 23:54:46 Kevin Ottens wrote: On Monday 06 January 2014 22:26:27 Alexander Neundorf wrote: IMO something like proposing the maintainers and approving

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w2

2014-01-07 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, As a reminder the maintainers list is available there: http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List People willing to maintain a framework should put their name in the corresponding column. On Tuesday 07 January 2014 16:53:30 Kevin Ottens wrote: * agateau plans to work on kapidox

Re: KDE Frameworks: Moving toward 5.0 final and Governance

2014-01-07 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Tuesday 07 January 2014 18:10:10 John Layt wrote: On 6 January 2014 07:52, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote: I urge everyone, and in particular people volunteering to maintain a framework, to do a pass of review of our code base and APIs to modernize them when appropriate

Re: KDE Frameworks: Moving toward 5.0 final and Governance

2014-01-07 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Tuesday 07 January 2014 23:30:28 John Layt wrote: On 7 January 2014 19:49, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote: Most of the dialog code from there has been merged into Qt5.2, or is planned for Qt 5.3, so needs deleting. I'm also wondering if we still need our own KPrintPreview dialog

Re: KDE Frameworks: Moving toward 5.0 final and Governance

2014-01-06 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Monday 06 January 2014 09:33:38 Martin Graesslin wrote: On Monday 06 January 2014 07:52:50 Kevin Ottens wrote: The current list of modules is there: http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List As you can see there's quite some holes in the table, and quite a few entries marked

Re: KDE Frameworks: Moving toward 5.0 final and Governance

2014-01-06 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Monday 06 January 2014 22:26:27 Alexander Neundorf wrote: IMO something like proposing the maintainers and approving them, similar to Qt, would be good, i.e. at least some kind of voting by who we will be governed. Definitely something we'll need at some point. For bootstrapping I'm more

KDE Frameworks: Moving toward 5.0 final and Governance

2014-01-05 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello all, Now that TP1 is almost out of the door, it is time to move toward the final release and put in place the governance of KDE Frameworks. It is a very large and multi-faceted product, so we will need people with longer term commitment if we want it to shine on release day. ## What's

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes Almost 2014

2013-12-31 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the last meeting of 2013. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: apol and myself. Announcement: * TP1 is almost ready, forwarding headers work missing * apol has been working on the header generation for KCoreAddons,

  1   2   3   >