On February 14, 2015 03:32:28 PM David Faure wrote:
> KConfig
>
> Fixed using KSharedConfig in global object destructor
I don't think this RR has been merged yet.
--
Matthew
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On January 21, 2015 05:12:07 PM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As promised in the earlier thread, i'd like to present the sysadmin
> report on the state of the infrastructure surrounding our code.
>
> It contains a detailed summary of what is broken with our existing
> systems, why change is n
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121879/#review73296
---
+1 from me.
- Matthew Dawson
On Jan. 6, 2015, 6:51 a.m
On January 3, 2015 03:31:26 PM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've gone over the comments everyone has made thus far and came up
> with the following community wishlist as it were.
> It represents a combination of what everyone has said, in a fairly
> distilled form.
>
> Regrettably there were
On December 25, 2014 08:21:05 PM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > The way I see it, there are two reasonable alternatives with the current
> > setup:
> >
> > 1) Everybody can create, delete and force-push to all branches except the
> > "reserved" ones (kde/*, master, stable,... see the list).
> >
> > 2) P
On January 25, 2014 10:02:09 PM Thomas Lübking wrote:
> On Samstag, 25. Januar 2014 21:03:44 CEST, Matthew Dawson wrote:
> > At least for ext4, xattrs are the default mode
>
> Indeed - removed user_xattr and they're still there.
>
> Do you happen to know when this
On January 21, 2014 02:54:39 PM Thomas Lübking wrote:
> On Dienstag, 21. Januar 2014 13:37:29 CEST, viv...@gmail.com wrote:
> > And windows?
>
> HPFS/NTFS has xattr support (through alternative data streams) and WINNT
> supports handling xattr on FAT as well.
>
> The problem about xattr is rather
On February 4, 2013 09:06:01 PM Valentin Rusu wrote:
> On Monday 04 February 2013 03:03:13 Matthew Dawson wrote:
> > On February 3, 2013 04:51:49 PM Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > > Btw: does anybody actually use the systray thing?
> > > I need to see that window ~ once a we
On February 3, 2013 04:51:49 PM Thomas Lübking wrote:
>
> Btw: does anybody actually use the systray thing?
> I need to see that window ~ once a week and then just launch the
> walletmanager (so the systray icon is disabled, but that's afaik not the
> default, is it?)
Is it really necessary to ha
On June 18, 2012 07:21:29 PM Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > > know the current state of the release and commit new features or new
> > > strings when we are frozen, and that's with just one release schedule, i
> > > can imagine the mess with N different release schedules
> >
> > "Always summer in t
On April 10, 2012 06:45:17 AM Laszlo Papp wrote:
> >> That having said, CDash was designed with CMake in mind. We already
> >> depend on CMake and CTest.
> >
> > We actually do not depend on CTest, that is an optional tool, one can
> > run the tests without ctest (in fact I've never used CTest on
? Also is
there any interest in having a GSOC involving said port?
Thanks for your time,
Matthew Dawson
12 matches
Mail list logo
