On Tuesday 09 November 2010 15:52:01 Hans Meine wrote:
Hi Aurélien,
I just want to express how much I appreciate your judiciousness to say you
dislike your own proposal now. I was quite sceptical about it, but did not
want to go bikeshedding, so I am happy you changed your mind *and*
On Monday 08 November 2010, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
On 08/11/2010 14:18, Thomas Lübking wrote:
Am Monday 08 November 2010 schrieb Johannes Sixt:
How is a checkable menu entry that is not checked different from a
menu entry that is not checkable, hm? There is *no* difference.
Broken UI
On Tuesday 09 November 2010 23:40:06 Ingo Klöcker wrote:
So what is Apple's solution for the problem of checkable menu entries?
What is Microsoft's solution?
GNOME uses X Toolbar [1]
MacOS X uses Show/Hide Toolbar [2]
[1] http://library.gnome.org/devel/hig-book/stable/menus-types.html.en
[2]
On 08/11/2010 14:18, Thomas Lübking wrote:
Am Monday 08 November 2010 schrieb Johannes Sixt:
How is a checkable menu entry that is not checked different from a menu
entry that is not checkable, hm? There is *no* difference.
Broken UI style? There *can be* a difference ;-P
Unchecked Box:
Hi,
I have been quite busy trying to convince everyone actions to toggle UI
items such as menubar, toolbars, sidebars or statusbar should be labeled
Show/hide Foo depending on the visibility of Foo rather than
implemented as a checkable [ ] Show Foo item.
Having started to work on converting
