Re: Extended handling of magnet links

2015-05-26 Thread Vladimir Perepechin
Yep, it must be a cool thing, but i don't think that it is a good idea. 1) All this p2p stuff has a listening port. (requires configuration, upnp and so on) 2) Some protocols requires pre-configuration. For ei dc++ requires hub and unique nickname. 3) In p2p world it's good to sid what u've

Re: Extended handling of magnet links

2015-05-26 Thread Vladimir Perepechin
Yep, magnet - it's an URI. It's has some information about resource, but doesn't specify how to get it. The problem is: 1) i'm web coder and i'm not good at c++. 2) I want to discuss this to implement a proper idea, may be someone have better ideas, or he knows why this shouldn't be done this

Re: Extended handling of magnet links

2015-05-24 Thread Aleix Pol
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Vladimir Perepechin vovochk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone :) I was thinking about implementing my idea https://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=83t=126352 . While digging sources i've understand that my idea was incorrect, and there is nothing to do with

Re: Extended handling of magnet links

2015-05-23 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dilluns, 18 de maig de 2015, a les 22:52:27, Vladimir Perepechin va escriure: Yep. The use case is following: magnet links are used by absolutely different applications: 1) Torrent (ktorrent) 2) DC++ (eiskaltdcpp) 3) eDonkey Every application uses magnet links, but! Magnet links for

Re: Extended handling of magnet links

2015-05-20 Thread Vladimir Perepechin
Yep. The use case is following: magnet links are used by absolutely different applications: 1) Torrent (ktorrent) 2) DC++ (eiskaltdcpp) 3) eDonkey Every application uses magnet links, but! Magnet links for every app are different. ktorrent can't handle links for dc++. The problem is that

Re: Extended handling of magnet links

2015-05-18 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dissabte, 16 de maig de 2015, a les 21:31:49, Vladimir Perepechin va escriure: Hi everyone :) I was thinking about implementing my idea https://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=83t=126352 . While digging sources i've understand that my idea was incorrect, and there is nothing to do with