On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 15:25:38 Laszlo Papp wrote:
...
* KJob - Qt-Addon for 5.1
Is the lack of manpower the reason or something else it is not planned
against 5.0 ? I have made some simple modifications in our project
where it is now KDE dependency free.
Partly manpower, but mainly
Hi,
A draft list was made of some areas for focus with names drafted in against
them:
...
* KJob - Qt-Addon for 5.1
Is the lack of manpower the reason or something else it is not planned
against 5.0 ? I have made some simple modifications in our project
where it is now KDE dependency free.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
A draft list was made of some areas for focus with names drafted in against
them:
...
* KJob - Qt-Addon for 5.1
Is the lack of manpower the reason or something else it is not planned
against 5.0 ? I have made some
Em Thursday, 30 de June de 2011, às 03:26:02, Christoph Feck escreveu:
We probably need kDebug(area) et al. features in Qt 5, too. For example, I
plan to make kdelibs/kimgio pure Qt, but when we switch to qDebug(), we
lose the ability to filter/redirect/suppress messages.
When you switch to
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:43 AM, John Layt jl...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
At QtCS we had a follow-up session from Platform 11 to discuss what technical
changes we'd like to see in Qt5.
One major point was the news that the Qt5 feature freeze is planned for
September/October giving us only 2-3
On Thursday 30 Jun 2011 23:42:42 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Thursday, June 30, 2011, John Layt va escriure:
Hi,
At QtCS we had a follow-up session from Platform 11 to discuss what
technical changes we'd like to see in Qt5.
The legal aspects of copying code from KDE was discussed.
On Thursday 30 June 2011 01:43:44 John Layt wrote:
Hi,
At QtCS we had a follow-up session from Platform 11 to discuss what
technical changes we'd like to see in Qt5.
One major point was the news that the Qt5 feature freeze is planned for
September/October giving us only 2-3 months to get
