Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-19 Thread Loren Burkholder
On Tuesday, December 19, 2023 9:43:06 AM EST J. Varela wrote: > Loren, > > We gave ideas. > > I think it's up to you to pick one. > >  > > You could also try a name generator. Chatgpt or something like it. > > > Thanks, > > JV > ICYMI, I have decided to go with Alpaka. Loren

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-19 Thread J. Varela
Loren, We gave ideas. I think it's up to you to pick one.  You could also try a name generator. Chatgpt or something like it. Thanks, JV

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-19 Thread J. Varela
Yes. It was mentioned this app is intended to manage Llama LLMs. - Llama manager - Herder (or some other language equivalent. Pastor in Spanish. As in herding your many llamas) - Corral (as in a place to keep llamas) Probably just want a name that is simple and easy for people to know what it

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-19 Thread Loren Burkholder
On Friday, December 15, 2023 10:16:41 PM EST Loren Burkholder wrote: > I'm back again with more name ideas. > > 1. Alpaka. (h/t to Kevin Kofler for the suggestion) I've tended to veer away > from names such as this, because there is a derivative of the Llama 2 model > called "Alpaca". However,

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-19 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Dienstag, 19. Dezember 2023 13:47:11 CET Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Dienstag, 19. Dezember 2023 08:31:56 CET Ingo Klöcker wrote: > > Calling someone by any animal name is mostly offensive. It's a pretty > > stupid argument to stop calling apps after animals. You should rather > > stop

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-19 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Dienstag, 19. Dezember 2023 08:31:56 CET Ingo Klöcker wrote: > On Montag, 18. Dezember 2023 23:30:57 CET jvap...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Montag, 18. Dezember 2023 22:27:43 CET Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > > A Kamel is a big, slow and un-funny animal, in german it's also not a > > > compliment

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-18 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Montag, 18. Dezember 2023 23:30:57 CET jvap...@gmail.com wrote: > On Montag, 18. Dezember 2023 22:27:43 CET Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > A Kamel is a big, slow and un-funny animal, in german it's also not a > > compliment to call somebody a Kamel. > > I had no idea. > > Yes, if it is

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-18 Thread jvapr27
I had no idea. Yes, if it is offensive then, do not use it.  I meant that the use of K made sense to me. Also, since the LLM was named Llama, and this one Kamel(camel), then seemed somewhat consistent.  But not if it is offensive. We do not want to be rude either.  thanks, JV   On Mon,

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-18 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Montag, 18. Dezember 2023 05:06:08 CET J. Varela wrote: > I like that. The k makes sense there. It also fits with the theme of the > target uses. Really ? A Kamel is a big, slow and un-funny animal, in german it's also not a compliment to call somebody a Kamel. Alex

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-17 Thread J. Varela
I like that. The k makes sense there. It also fits with the theme of the target uses. JV On Sun, Dec 17, 2023, 10:54 AM Martin Koller wrote: > On Freitag, 15. Dezember 2023 00:29:19 CET Justin Zobel wrote: > > I'm a fan of K when it's used well e.g. Kalendar or Kontact but not > KMyApp > >

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-17 Thread Martin Koller
On Freitag, 15. Dezember 2023 00:29:19 CET Justin Zobel wrote: > I'm a fan of K when it's used well e.g. Kalendar or Kontact but not KMyApp "Kamel" (german for camel) which is a kind of Lama -- Best regards/Schöne Grüße Martin A: Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q: Why is

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-15 Thread Jakob Petsovits
While I personally don't mind app name discussions, I also wonder if kde-core-devel is really the right forum for this. I figure you won't get as much discussion in a GitLab ticket, but perhaps the friendly community in KDE Discuss has some good ideas? But since I'm already sending a mail,

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-15 Thread Loren Burkholder
I'm back again with more name ideas. 1. Alpaka. (h/t to Kevin Kofler for the suggestion) I've tended to veer away from names such as this, because there is a derivative of the Llama 2 model called "Alpaca". However, Alpaca is an open project built by some Stanford researchers, so I doubt that

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-14 Thread Justin Zobel
I'm a fan of K when it's used well e.g. Kalendar or Kontact but not KMyApp On 15/12/23 08:31, J. Varela wrote: Very cool! If there is a good reason for the k, for example the German spelling of the word, then yes. It makes sense to me. Thanks JV On Wed, Dec 13, 2023, 9:26 PM Kevin

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-14 Thread J. Varela
Very cool! If there is a good reason for the k, for example the German spelling of the word, then yes. It makes sense to me. Thanks JV On Wed, Dec 13, 2023, 9:26 PM Kevin Kofler wrote: > J. Varela wrote: > > I think it shouldn't have a name that starts with K, and that it should > be > >

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-13 Thread Kevin Kofler
J. Varela wrote: > I think it shouldn't have a name that starts with K, and that it should be > named something related to llama, the large language model. The closest relatives to the llama are the vicuña, the guanaco, and the alpaca. The German spellings Vikunja, Guanako, and Alpaka kontain a

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-12 Thread J. Varela
Maybe we can help. Can you give us some information in your own words of what the application does? What is it used for? How is it better/different than what is currently available? Thanks JV On Tue, Dec 12, 2023, 9:40 AM Ömer Fadıl USTA wrote: > just add random words to Nebula > nebulaNest

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-12 Thread Ömer Fadıl USTA
just add random words to Nebula nebulaNest , nebulaBird ,, nebulaWatson , nebulaRover , nebulaScout ... i am also not good at names :) On Tue, Dec 12, 2023, 15:59 Loren Burkholder wrote: > On Tuesday, December 12, 2023 1:59:22 AM EST Ingo Klöcker wrote: > > On Dienstag, 12. Dezember 2023

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-12 Thread J. Varela
Does it have to start with a K? What does this app do? I would try to name it based on what it does. I see that it is used to interact with a LLM named llama. I think it shouldn't have a name that starts with K, and that it should be named something related to llama, the large language model.

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-12 Thread Loren Burkholder
On Tuesday, December 12, 2023 1:59:22 AM EST Ingo Klöcker wrote: > On Dienstag, 12. Dezember 2023 06:23:07 CET Ömer Fadıl USTA wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023, 07:40 Loren Burkholder wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I've settled on "Kognos" as a good name for this app. (I'm not creative > > >

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-11 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Dienstag, 12. Dezember 2023 06:23:07 CET Ömer Fadıl USTA wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023, 07:40 Loren Burkholder wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've settled on "Kognos" as a good name for this app. (I'm not creative > > enough to come up with the name myself; fittingly, this name was generated > >

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-11 Thread Ömer Fadıl USTA
d like to thank everyone who has pitched in to help me, mainly > Laurent and redstrate). At this point, while the app is not necessarily > feature-complete or fully polished, it's getting close to that point. > Therefore, I'd like to officially request a review of Kandalf for inclusion &

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-11 Thread Loren Burkholder
, while the app is not necessarily feature-complete > or fully polished, it's getting close to that point. Therefore, I'd like to > officially request a review of Kandalf for inclusion in the KDE apps. > > You can reach me on Matrix at @lorendb:nheko.im for more instant > communications. &

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-08 Thread Joshua Goins
> To be fair, nowhere in > https://community.kde.org/Policies/Application_Lifecycle#kdereview does > it say who is supposed to check what box, so people checking "obvious" > boxes like "It has a passing CI build" themselves isn't that far off. I think self-checking is fine, as long as another

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-08 Thread Loren Burkholder
o thank everyone who has pitched in to help me, mainly > > Laurent and redstrate). At this point, while the app is not necessarily > > feature-complete or fully polished, it's getting close to that point. > > Therefore, I'd like to officially request a review of Kandalf for inclusion

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-07 Thread Nicolas Fella
to officially request a review of Kandalf for inclusion in the KDE apps. Where is the thing we're supposed to review? In the wrong place:https://invent.kde.org/lorendb/kandalf/-/issues/1 And again we have people self-checking the checkboxes or their own review :sad_dance: To be fair, nowhere in https

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-07 Thread Nicolas Fella
to officially request a review of Kandalf for inclusion in the KDE apps. Where is the thing we're supposed to review? In the wrong place: https://invent.kde.org/lorendb/kandalf/-/issues/1 And again we have people self-checking the checkboxes or their own review :sad_dance: I asked Loren to create

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-07 Thread Albert Astals Cid
omplete or fully polished, it's getting close to that point. > > > Therefore, I'd like to officially request a review of Kandalf for > > > inclusion > > > in the KDE apps. > > > > Where is the thing we're supposed to review? > > In the wrong place

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-07 Thread Carl Schwan
thank everyone who has pitched in to help me, mainly > > Laurent and redstrate). At this point, while the app is not necessarily > > feature-complete or fully polished, it's getting close to that point. > > Therefore, I'd like to officially request a review of Kandalf for inclusion &g

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-07 Thread Albert Astals Cid
is point, while the app is not necessarily > feature-complete or fully polished, it's getting close to that point. > Therefore, I'd like to officially request a review of Kandalf for inclusion > in the KDE apps. Where is the thing we're supposed to review? Cheers, Albert > &

Re: Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-07 Thread Harald Sitter
andalf ready for integration into KDE (and > I'd like to thank everyone who has pitched in to help me, mainly Laurent and > redstrate). At this point, while the app is not necessarily feature-complete > or fully polished, it's getting close to that point. Therefore, I'd like to > off

Kandalf: request for review

2023-12-07 Thread Loren Burkholder
. Therefore, I'd like to officially request a review of Kandalf for inclusion in the KDE apps. You can reach me on Matrix at @lorendb:nheko.im for more instant communications. Thanks, Loren Burkholder signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.