David Jarvie wrote:
>>
>> Anyway, I've started a page to document such things at
>> http://community.kde.org/KDE_Core/QtMerge , feel free to add stuff there.
>> David Jarvie, could you add something to the KDateTime entry?
>
> Done. I hope it contains enough explanation - if you think it needs mo
John Layt wrote:
> On Monday 14 February 2011 22:35:13 Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> You might think in terms of how much a typical KDE application ends up
>> using, but I'm thinking in terms of how much a typical Qt application
>> ends up using. Gregory is not going to end up using KLocale KConfig
>> K
On Wed, February 16, 2011 11:57 am, John Layt wrote:
> The thing is, most of what is in kdecore date classes really does belong
> in the Qt classes, these are standard things on all platforms that Qt just
> hasn't
> implemented. QLocale is bizarrely incomplete in places. Why wouldn't Qt
> want
>
On Monday 14 February 2011 22:35:13 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> You might think in terms of how much a typical KDE application ends up
> using, but I'm thinking in terms of how much a typical Qt application ends
> up using. Gregory is not going to end up using KLocale KConfig KDateTime
> etc just becaus
