Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-17 Thread Vishesh Handa
Hey I just thought everyone should know what's going on with Nepomuk. As per 4.9, we are going to have 3 repositories - * nepomuk-core [1] * nepomuk-kde-kio [2] * nepomuk-kde-config [3] kde-runtime/nepomuk will be removed. Kdelibs will not be touched. All the headers are being installed under n

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-17 Thread Vishesh Handa
Forgot to add the correct kde-packagers email. On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > Hey > > I just thought everyone should know what's going on with Nepomuk. > > As per 4.9, we are going to have 3 repositories - > > * nepomuk-core [1] > * nepomuk-kde-kio [2] > * nepomuk-kde-co

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-17 Thread Allen Winter
On Thursday 17 May 2012 10:01:14 AM Vishesh Handa wrote: > Hey > > I just thought everyone should know what's going on with Nepomuk. > > As per 4.9, we are going to have 3 repositories - > > * nepomuk-core [1] > * nepomuk-kde-kio [2] > * nepomuk-kde-config [3] > > kde-runtime/nepomuk will be re

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-17 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dijous, 17 de maig de 2012, a les 19:31:14, Vishesh Handa va escriure: > Hey > @Translators: You probably want to preserve the translations in > kde-runtime/nepomuk. How do we go about this? That's not a problem. Albert

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-17 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2012-05-17, Vishesh Handa wrote: > @Packagers: We will not be maintaining binary compatibility in > nepomuk-core. At least not for KDE 4.10. We still need to break a lot of > things. NACK. this is a completely no go. /Sune

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-17 Thread Sebastian Trüg
I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are the DBus interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are supposed to be used instead of the dbus interfaces... On 05/17/2012 09:19 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2012-05-17, Vishesh Handa wrote: >> @Packagers: We will

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-17 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are the DBus > interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are > supposed to be used instead of the dbus interfaces... Great. thanks. hugs and kisses /Sune > > On 05/17/2012 09:

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-17 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > > I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are the DBus > > interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are > > supposed to be used instead of the dbus interfaces...

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-17 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Thursday, 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are the DBus > interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are > supposed to be used instead of the dbus interfaces... I think as long as you didn't advertise the D-Bus in

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-22 Thread Vishesh Handa
Does anyone have suggestions on where nepomuk-kde-kio and nepomuk-kde-config should be placed? I was thinking under kde-baseaps, but that might not be correct. Any suggestions? On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Kevin Krammer wrote: > On Thursday, 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > > I think we

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-22 Thread Vishesh Handa
Sebastian Change of plans. As per recent discussions with tsdgeos and kde_pepo on #kde-devel - They would like to avoid too many new repositories. So, if it's okay with you we'll keep the nepomuk-kde-config and nepomuk-kde-kio code in kde-runtime, while the rest can be removed as it is there in n

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-29 Thread Sebastian Trüg
darn. Now that I did it all On 05/23/2012 01:34 AM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > Sebastian > > Change of plans. As per recent discussions with tsdgeos and kde_pepo on > #kde-devel - > > They would like to avoid too many new repositories. So, if it's okay > with you we'll keep the nepomuk-kde-confi

Re: [Nepomuk] Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-17 Thread Sebastian Trüg
On 05/17/2012 10:08 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Sune Vuorela > wrote: > > On 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg mailto:tr...@kde.org>> > wrote: > > I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are > the DBus >

Re: [Nepomuk] Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-17 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > On 05/17/2012 10:08 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Sune Vuorela > > wrote: > > > > On 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg mailto:tr...@kde.org>> > > wrote: > > > I think w