On 02/01/2011 01:21 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 01.02.11 13:05:49, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
>> On 02/01/2011 11:11 AM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>>> On 01.02.11 10:21:01, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
Hi list,
I have been working on an improvement for Nepomuk via git-svn for a
while now a
On 01.02.11 13:05:49, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
> On 02/01/2011 11:11 AM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 01.02.11 10:21:01, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
> >> Hi list,
> >>
> >> I have been working on an improvement for Nepomuk via git-svn for a
> >> while now and would now like to push it to kde-runtime.
> >
On 02/01/2011 11:11 AM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 01.02.11 10:21:01, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I have been working on an improvement for Nepomuk via git-svn for a
>> while now and would now like to push it to kde-runtime.
>
> If the branch has been created via git-svn you cannot me
On 01.02.11 10:21:01, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have been working on an improvement for Nepomuk via git-svn for a
> while now and would now like to push it to kde-runtime.
If the branch has been created via git-svn you cannot merge it properly.
You need to cherry-pick all commits.
>
On 1 February 2011 09:21, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have been working on an improvement for Nepomuk via git-svn for a
> while now and would now like to push it to kde-runtime.
> However, I would prefer to keep the commit history and backport to 4.6.
> Thus, I thought of pushing my fea
Hi list,
I have been working on an improvement for Nepomuk via git-svn for a
while now and would now like to push it to kde-runtime.
However, I would prefer to keep the commit history and backport to 4.6.
Thus, I thought of pushing my feature branch into the kde-runtime
repository and then merge i