On Friday, October 2, 2015 8:38:20 PM CEST Michael Pyne wrote:
> On Fri, October 2, 2015 23:59:00 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Friday 02 October 2015, a les 22:24:00, Martin Graesslin va escriure:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I added a new unit test to kwin today [1] and it failed on the CI system
On Fri, October 2, 2015 23:59:00 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Friday 02 October 2015, a les 22:24:00, Martin Graesslin va escriure:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I added a new unit test to kwin today [1] and it failed on the CI system
> > due to the enabled ASAN with an error in kwindowsystem. I'm able to
El Friday 02 October 2015, a les 22:24:00, Martin Graesslin va escriure:
> Hi all,
>
> I added a new unit test to kwin today [1] and it failed on the CI system due
> to the enabled ASAN with an error in kwindowsystem. I'm able to reproduce
> it locally, but fail to understand it. To me the code an
get_stringlist_reply creates the byte arrays QByteArray::fromRawData(), nukes
the reply and returns the list which now contains freed memory.
This also was just a problem in Baloo; smells like the ::fromRawArray
"constructor" could use a free function pointer to be called when the bytearray
i
Hi all,
I added a new unit test to kwin today [1] and it failed on the CI system due
to the enabled ASAN with an error in kwindowsystem. I'm able to reproduce it
locally, but fail to understand it. To me the code and the test conditions
looks correct. Relevant part of the bt:
#0 0x7f5198ac2c84
