On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 05:17:25 Dario Freddi wrote:
this mail comes after a certain discussion on how to handle screen
inhibition. At the moment, the aforementioned function leads to an
inhibition of DPMS features and brightness handling - I propose to
change that to include also
On 01/17/2012 05:17 AM, Dario Freddi wrote:
Howdy,
this mail comes after a certain discussion on how to handle screen
inhibition. At the moment, the aforementioned function leads to an
inhibition of DPMS features and brightness handling - I propose to
change that to include also Screensaver
Cool :) If no objections arise within the next hours, I'll commit the change
2012/1/17 Alex Fiestas afies...@kde.org:
On 01/17/2012 05:17 AM, Dario Freddi wrote:
Howdy,
this mail comes after a certain discussion on how to handle screen
inhibition. At the moment, the aforementioned function
Howdy,
this mail comes after a certain discussion on how to handle screen
inhibition. At the moment, the aforementioned function leads to an
inhibition of DPMS features and brightness handling - I propose to
change that to include also Screensaver inhibition, to provide a full
hassle-free
