On Monday 14 January 2013 20:51:57 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dilluns, 14 de gener de 2013, a les 20:36:03, André Wöbbeking va
escriure:
> > On Monday 14 January 2013 20:25:21 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > If you think that packagers should be informed about this change what
> > > are you wai
On Monday 14 January 2013, André Wöbbeking wrote:
> On Monday 14 January 2013 20:25:21 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Dilluns, 14 de gener de 2013, a les 20:02:30, André Wöbbeking va
>
> escriure:
> > > Hi Albert,
> > >
> > > On Monday 08 October 2012 22:40:55 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > > Of
El Dilluns, 14 de gener de 2013, a les 20:36:03, André Wöbbeking va escriure:
> On Monday 14 January 2013 20:25:21 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Dilluns, 14 de gener de 2013, a les 20:02:30, André Wöbbeking va
>
> escriure:
> > > Hi Albert,
> > >
> > > On Monday 08 October 2012 22:40:55 Albert
On Monday 14 January 2013 20:25:21 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dilluns, 14 de gener de 2013, a les 20:02:30, André Wöbbeking va
escriure:
> > Hi Albert,
> >
> > On Monday 08 October 2012 22:40:55 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > Of course, enabling building the tests by defaults makes compilation
El Dilluns, 14 de gener de 2013, a les 20:02:30, André Wöbbeking va escriure:
> Hi Albert,
>
> On Monday 08 October 2012 22:40:55 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Of course, enabling building the tests by defaults makes compilation times
> > a bit longer, but I do think that the benefits far surpass t
Hi Albert,
On Monday 08 October 2012 22:40:55 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Of course, enabling building the tests by defaults makes compilation times a
> bit longer, but I do think that the benefits far surpass the problems and
> for people with really slow machines and/or needs to recompile stuff
El Dilluns, 8 d'octubre de 2012, a les 22:40:55, Albert Astals Cid va
escriure:
> Hi fellow kde-core-develers, i was thinking that from time to time someone
> commits some code that breaks the building of the tests.
>
> This happens because people is not aware that those parts are unit tested.
>
> Actually I've always been unsure why packagers don't run unit tests...
> Maybe this would help.
Because sometimes tests require certain "features" of the environment when
building (read: running the test), like running X or network, which will make
the whole build fail if not present.
> Because the tests are broken in certain environments (just like last
> time on Harmattan with the frameworks branch) and due to the lack of
> time on the packagers' side to fix upstream bugs, they choose the
> simpler way as a temporary workaround. Therefore, they can proceed
> with the project,
> +1 for always building unit tests!
> Actually I've always been unsure why packagers don't run unit tests...
> Maybe this would help.
Because the tests are broken in certain environments (just like last
time on Harmattan with the frameworks branch) and due to the lack of
time on the packagers' si
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Hi fellow kde-core-develers, i was thinking that from time to time someone
> commits some code that breaks the building of the tests.
>
> This happens because people is not aware that those parts are unit tested.
>
> I think that by enabl
On Monday 08 October 2012 22:40:55 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Hi fellow kde-core-develers, i was thinking that from time to time someone
> commits some code that breaks the building of the tests.
>
> This happens because people is not aware that those parts are unit tested.
>
> I think that by en
On Monday 08 October 2012 22:40:55 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Hi fellow kde-core-develers, i was thinking that from time to time someone
> commits some code that breaks the building of the tests.
>
> This happens because people is not aware that those parts are unit tested.
>
> I think that by en
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Lamarque V. Souza wrote:
> Em Monday 08 October 2012, Àlex Fiestas escreveu:
>
>> Anything to make developers (including myself) more unit test aware,
>
>> I'm all for it, even if it helps only a little bit.
>
>
>
> +1
+1 from me as well.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Lamarque V
Em Monday 08 October 2012, Àlex Fiestas escreveu:
> Anything to make developers (including myself) more unit test aware,
> I'm all for it, even if it helps only a little bit.
+1
--
Lamarque V. Souza
KDE's Network Management maintainer
http://planetkde.org/pt-br
On Monday 08 October 2012 10:40:55 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Hi fellow kde-core-develers, i was thinking that from time to time someone
> commits some code that breaks the building of the tests.
>
> This happens because people is not aware that those parts are unit tested.
>
> I think that b
Anything to make developers (including myself) more unit test aware,
I'm all for it, even if it helps only a little bit.
Hi fellow kde-core-develers, i was thinking that from time to time someone
commits some code that breaks the building of the tests.
This happens because people is not aware that those parts are unit tested.
I think that by enabling the building of the tests by default we at least make
sure the
18 matches
Mail list logo
