On Tuesday 14 July 2015 07:08:57 Andreas Cord-Landwehr wrote:
If it is OK this way, I can add it later today to the wiki page.
Hi, since I did not hear any oppositions, I just added the paragraph to the
wiki page draft.
Cheers,
Andreas
Hi,
Since this hasn't been finalized I didn't include it in my email to kde-cvs-
announce about the creation of the 15.08 branches for the KDE Applications
modules.
Cheers,
Albert
El Dimarts, 14 de juliol de 2015, a les 07:08:57, Andreas Cord-Landwehr va
escriure:
On Monday 13 July
El Dilluns, 20 de juliol de 2015, a les 09:42:40, Andreas Cord-Landwehr va
escriure:
On Tuesday 14 July 2015 07:08:57 Andreas Cord-Landwehr wrote:
If it is OK this way, I can add it later today to the wiki page.
Hi, since I did not hear any oppositions, I just added the paragraph to the
Since this hasn't been finalized I didn't include it in my email to kde-cvs-
announce about the creation of the 15.08 branches for the KDE Applications
modules.
Cheers,
Albert
El Dimarts, 14 de juliol de 2015, a les 07:08:57, Andreas Cord-Landwehr va
escriure:
On Monday 13 July 2015
On Monday 13 July 2015 23:14:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
I did a few tweaks, i still feel it seems this is the official way other
than an optional way of defining the version but maybe that's just me.
Hi, I have the same feeling as Albert that the current text is not clear
enough that both
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Christoph Cullmann cullm...@absint.com wrote:
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
El Dissabte, 11 de juliol de 2015, a les 16:59:13, Christoph Cullmann va
escriure:
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
El Dissabte, 11 de juliol de 2015, a les 15:52:44, Christoph
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
El Dissabte, 11 de juliol de 2015, a les 16:59:13, Christoph Cullmann va
escriure:
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
El Dissabte, 11 de juliol de 2015, a les 15:52:44, Christoph Cullmann va
escriure:
Hi, something like that?
Hi, something like that?
https://userbase.kde.org/KDE_Applications_Versioning
Where to move it? And is the script in place now?
Greetings
Christoph
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Aleix Pol aleix...@kde.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Martin
El Dissabte, 11 de juliol de 2015, a les 15:52:44, Christoph Cullmann va
escriure:
Hi, something like that?
https://userbase.kde.org/KDE_Applications_Versioning
I'd like to make it clearer that this is optional and maybe also an example
that only uses KDE_APPLICATIONS_VERSION_MICRO
Also
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
El Dissabte, 11 de juliol de 2015, a les 15:52:44, Christoph Cullmann va
escriure:
Hi, something like that?
https://userbase.kde.org/KDE_Applications_Versioning
I'd like to make it clearer that this is optional and maybe also an example
that only uses
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Martin Klapetek
martin.klape...@gmail.com wrote:
As the KDE Apps release is getting near, is this being considered/deployed?
Should we be setting some CMake variables?
Cheers
--
Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer
Yes, that's why Albert was asking for a
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Aleix Pol aleix...@kde.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Martin Klapetek
martin.klape...@gmail.com wrote:
As the KDE Apps release is getting near, is this being
considered/deployed?
Should we be setting some CMake variables?
Cheers
--
As the KDE Apps release is getting near, is this being considered/deployed?
Should we be setting some CMake variables?
Cheers
--
Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer
El Dilluns, 8 de juny de 2015, a les 20:25:19, Christoph Cullmann va escriure:
Hi,
for frameworks, it is all very nice and automatic, the version in the
CMakeLists.txt get auto-updated on each KF 5.x release.
It seems to me, for the applications collection, something similar might
make
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:35 AM, David Jarvie djar...@kde.org wrote:
There has been debate about this for frameworks, and there is an argument
there (not agreed by everybody) for making all frameworks have the same
version, since framework libraries are dependencies for other software.
On Mon, June 8, 2015 11:32 pm, Aleix Pol wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Christoph Cullmann cullm...@absint.com
wrote:
Hi,
for frameworks, it is all very nice and automatic, the version in the
CMakeLists.txt get auto-updated on each KF 5.x release.
It seems to me, for the
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:35 AM, David Jarvie djar...@kde.org wrote:
There has been debate about this for frameworks, and there is an argument
there (not agreed by everybody) for making all frameworks have the same
version, since framework libraries are dependencies for other software.
The
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Christoph Cullmann cullm...@absint.com wrote:
Personally I prefer having the application versions matching the release
version
(ie. 15.04.x) so that there is no additional versions mapping required (is
version 3.4
part of KDE Applications 15.04 or 15.08
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Christoph Cullmann cullm...@absint.com wrote:
Hi,
for frameworks, it is all very nice and automatic, the version in the
CMakeLists.txt get auto-updated on each KF 5.x release.
It seems to me, for the applications collection, something similar might
make
19 matches
Mail list logo
