Re: Moving libsolid-hal to unmaintained?

2012-04-23 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Monday 23 April 2012 11:18:14 todd rme wrote: > Is there a way to have it so HAL is enabled by default on BSD systems, > but on Linux systems you need to manually use a cmake flag to enable > it? It's kind of already the case, except that instead of a CMake flag, right now it's controlled by an

Re: Moving libsolid-hal to unmaintained?

2012-04-23 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Monday 23 April 2012 11:22:15 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Alex Fiestas writes: > > On Monday, April 23, 2012 11:18:14 AM todd rme wrote: > >> Is there a way to have it so HAL is enabled by default on BSD systems, > >> but on Linux systems you need to manually use a cmake flag to enable > >>

Re: Moving libsolid-hal to unmaintained?

2012-04-23 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
Alex Fiestas writes: > On Monday, April 23, 2012 11:18:14 AM todd rme wrote: >> Is there a way to have it so HAL is enabled by default on BSD systems, >> but on Linux systems you need to manually use a cmake flag to enable >> it? > Well I don't see why we need HAL on Linux, so unless you can give

Re: Re: Moving libsolid-hal to unmaintained?

2012-04-23 Thread Alex Fiestas
On Monday, April 23, 2012 11:18:14 AM todd rme wrote: > Is there a way to have it so HAL is enabled by default on BSD systems, > but on Linux systems you need to manually use a cmake flag to enable > it? Well I don't see why we need HAL on Linux, so unless you can give me some reason too keep it I

Re: Moving libsolid-hal to unmaintained?

2012-04-23 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
> Is there a way to have it so HAL is enabled by default on BSD systems, > but on Linux systems you need to manually use a cmake flag to enable > it? if (CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME MATCHES "BSD") set(HAL_OPTION_DEFAULT TRUE) else () set(HAL_OPTION DEFAULT FALSE) endif () option(KDE4_USE_HAL "Enable So

Re: Moving libsolid-hal to unmaintained?

2012-04-23 Thread todd rme
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Alex Fiestas wrote: > Hello everybody! > > I'm doing some bug triage on libsolid (as well of some bug fixing) and I'm > finding that most "nasty" bugs are fault of our HAL backend (or HAL itself). > > I tried to build HAL and failed on it (easy fix though) but that

Re: Moving libsolid-hal to unmaintained?

2012-04-21 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
Alex Fiestas writes: > So real question is, who is using libsolid-hal nowdays? At least the BSD people are; nobody came up with a BSD implementation of the *kit/u* stuff from Linux, so we're still using Hal. > Once we know the answer to that question I will: > -Make HAL backend option only avai