On Thursday 23 August 2012 12:57:43 Harald Sitter wrote:
> FWIW, last I talked to Robert about Canonical's involvement (which I
> believe was at UDS in May last year) only the greeters were to be
> covered by the CLA.
Only the greeters created by Canonical, not all of them.
On Wednesday 22 August 2012 20:44:00 Sune Vuorela wrote:
> From my personal view and as a packager, I would say "we only need *one*
> display manager in the workspace". So, if lightdm comes, then KDM must
> go in my opinion.
No, LightDM-KDE and KDM solve different problems. KDM is a full-blown disp
