On Wednesday 12 October 2011 19:38:11 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:47:54PM +0200, Dario Freddi wrote:
> > 2011/10/12 Martin Gräßlin :
> > > ok I have been thinking about it and have a new proposal:
> > > * writing a kded module to only handle the screen locking (grab keybo
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:47:54PM +0200, Dario Freddi wrote:
> 2011/10/12 Martin Gräßlin :
> > ok I have been thinking about it and have a new proposal:
> > * writing a kded module to only handle the screen locking (grab keyboard and
> > mouse)
>
> TBH, if you really care about not making the thi
2011/10/12 Martin Gräßlin :
> On Wednesday 12 October 2011 09:10:40 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>> > Of course KWin is a more complex application than others, but given
>> > what we need in a screen locker the difference becomes marginal IMHO.
>>
>> yes. one should consider decoupling the greeter fro
On Wednesday 12 October 2011 09:10:40 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > Of course KWin is a more complex application than others, but given
> > what we need in a screen locker the difference becomes marginal IMHO.
>
> yes. one should consider decoupling the greeter from the core engine.
>
> > > > I m
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 06:30:40PM +0200, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 October 2011 17:34:10 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > on a more serious note, [h]ow do you handle the lock grace time?
>
> this is actually not affected by the changes. Dim Display and turning off the
> screen are decoup
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 21:06:13 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 October 2011, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 October 2011 16:06:11 Andras Mantia wrote:
> > > From here:
> > > "If KWin crashes without restarting privacy is leaked but the system is
> > > hardly useable due to m
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 17:34:10 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 03:55:15PM +0200, Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:33:39 +0200 schrieb Torgny Nyblom :
> > > Does this mean that I will be focred to use a screensaver with
> > > password unlock? If so why is tha
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 17:47:13 you wrote:
> Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:00:46 +0200
>
> schrieb Martin Gräßlin :
> > that is a good suggestion. I will think about how I can add that.
> > Though if someone breaks by crashing kwin he is also able to remove
> > any log. So this could be just snakeoil.
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 16:33:39 you wrote:
> Once the screen locker crashes, security must be assumed
> broken (if only by visual access).
> Therefore the locker must not crash
full ack, we have to be at 0 crashes in KWin (which has to be our goal for
Wayland anyway ;-)
> and if it does, re-es
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 16:06:11 Andras Mantia wrote:
> From here:
> "If KWin crashes without restarting privacy is leaked but the system is
> hardly useable due to missing window manager. This situation can savely
> be ignored as a corner case as KWin normaly restart."
>
> This is not true, th
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 15:33:39 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 October 2011 14.55.29 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > On Monday 10 October 2011 20:02:07 Parker Coates wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 14:02, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > > > I want to request a security audit for the changes to en
On Monday 10 October 2011 20:02:07 Parker Coates wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 14:02, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > I want to request a security audit for the changes to ensure that the new
> > implementation is as secure as the existing one and that I did not forget
> > an important case which would
12 matches
Mail list logo
