Re: Review Request: KDateEdit moving into kdelibs

2011-03-25 Thread Torgny Nyblom
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6014/#review10017 --- Closing as it seems abandoned and involved repos are in git now.

Re: Review Request: KDateEdit moving into kdelibs

2010-11-30 Thread David Jarvie
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6014/#review9054 --- The code is based on an old version of KDateEdit - the feature in

Re: Review Request: KDateEdit moving into kdelibs

2010-11-29 Thread Kevin Ottens
> On 2010-11-29 22:24:15, John Layt wrote: > > Before I get stuck in, three points: > > > > 1) Screenshots? > > 2) API freeze: this will need explicit approval from the release team as > > well as k-c-d. What's the feeling on this? > > 3) String freeze: this will need an exemption for any new

Re: Review Request: KDateEdit moving into kdelibs

2010-11-29 Thread John Layt
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6014/#review9046 --- Before I get stuck in, three points: 1) Screenshots? 2) API freez

Review Request: KDateEdit moving into kdelibs

2010-11-29 Thread Kevin Ottens
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6014/ --- Review request for kdelibs and KDE PIM. Summary --- For a very long tim