> On Dec. 24, 2011, 8:28 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > This seems like a dangerous change to me.
> >
> > With it, you could run multiple instance of "kmail --nofork", and they
> > would step on each other's toes. The whole point of kuniqueapplication (in
> > normal apps, not in konsole), is to
> On Dec. 24, 2011, 8:28 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > This seems like a dangerous change to me.
> >
> > With it, you could run multiple instance of "kmail --nofork", and they
> > would step on each other's toes. The whole point of kuniqueapplication (in
> > normal apps, not in konsole), is to
> On Dec. 24, 2011, 8:28 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > This seems like a dangerous change to me.
> >
> > With it, you could run multiple instance of "kmail --nofork", and they
> > would step on each other's toes. The whole point of kuniqueapplication (in
> > normal apps, not in konsole), is to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/10/
---
(Updated Dec. 25, 2011, 9:01 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs and Konsole.
> On Dec. 24, 2011, 8:28 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > This seems like a dangerous change to me.
> >
> > With it, you could run multiple instance of "kmail --nofork", and they
> > would step on each other's toes. The whole point of kuniqueapplication (in
> > normal apps, not in konsole), is to
> On Dec. 24, 2011, 8:28 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > This seems like a dangerous change to me.
> >
> > With it, you could run multiple instance of "kmail --nofork", and they
> > would step on each other's toes. The whole point of kuniqueapplication (in
> > normal apps, not in konsole), is to
> On Dec. 24, 2011, 8:28 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > This seems like a dangerous change to me.
> >
> > With it, you could run multiple instance of "kmail --nofork", and they
> > would step on each other's toes. The whole point of kuniqueapplication (in
> > normal apps, not in konsole), is to
> On Dec. 24, 2011, 8:28 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > This seems like a dangerous change to me.
> >
> > With it, you could run multiple instance of "kmail --nofork", and they
> > would step on each other's toes. The whole point of kuniqueapplication (in
> > normal apps, not in konsole), is to
> On Dec. 24, 2011, 8:28 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > This seems like a dangerous change to me.
> >
> > With it, you could run multiple instance of "kmail --nofork", and they
> > would step on each other's toes. The whole point of kuniqueapplication (in
> > normal apps, not in konsole), is to
> On Dec. 24, 2011, 8:28 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > This seems like a dangerous change to me.
> >
> > With it, you could run multiple instance of "kmail --nofork", and they
> > would step on each other's toes. The whole point of kuniqueapplication (in
> > normal apps, not in konsole), is to
> On Dec. 23, 2011, 11:59 a.m., Askar Safin wrote:
> > Ship It!
I don't think you're supposed to "Ship it" your own change, the point of
reviewboard is to get reviews from others :-)
- David
---
This is an automatically generated e-mai
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/10/#review9226
---
This seems like a dangerous change to me.
With it, you could ru
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/10/#review9200
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Askar Safin
On Dec. 23, 2011, 11:58 a.m.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/10/
---
(Updated Dec. 23, 2011, 11:58 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Summary
14 matches
Mail list logo
