> I'm reopening this thread again as I think (and ask you to correct me if not)
> the library now meets all the requirements to be moved to extragear.
IMO, just go ahead, move to extragear!
You had fixed the issues requested more than one month ago (very
swiftly) without any further complains.
B
On Saturday 26 of May 2012 00:47:04 Dan Vratil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> LibKGoogle is a new optional dependency of kdepim-runtime. It's used by the
> new Akonadi Google resources.
>
> It's now in kdereview [0] and I'd like to move it to extragear, so I'm
> asking for a review on the library.
Hi,
I'm re
On Wednesday 30 of May 2012 21:39:55 Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > I'm sorry, but unless there's an objective objection, I'll rename the
> > library and everything inside to LibKGAPI.
>
> I personally like this the best so far amongst the discussed.
Thanks for support :)
I have officially released Lib
On Sunday 27 of May 2012 12:53:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dissabte, 26 de maig de 2012, a les 17:23:13, Dan Vratil va escriure:
> > On Saturday 26 of May 2012 11:42:41 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> > > Dan Vratil writes:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > LibKGoogle is a new optional dependency o
On Wednesday 30 of May 2012 17:47:31 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 11:56:00 PM Dan Vratil wrote:
> > On Monday 28 of May 2012 20:34:51 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> > > On Monday, May 28, 2012 02:56:44 PM Dan Vratil wrote:
> > > > libgapi might lead confusion with the glib world.
> > >
>
> I'm sorry, but unless there's an objective objection, I'll rename the library
> and everything inside to LibKGAPI.
I personally like this the best so far amongst the discussed.
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
On Wednesday 30 May 2012 17:47:31 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 11:56:00 PM Dan Vratil wrote:
> > On Monday 28 of May 2012 20:34:51 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> > > libgapi seems ok to me.
> >
> > I'm sorry, but unless there's an objective objection, I'll rename the
> > library and everyt
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 11:56:00 PM Dan Vratil wrote:
> On Monday 28 of May 2012 20:34:51 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> > On Monday, May 28, 2012 02:56:44 PM Dan Vratil wrote:
> > > libgapi might lead confusion with the glib world.
> >
> > As libwebkit lead to confusion since it seems that it is toolkig
On Monday 28 of May 2012 20:34:51 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> On Monday, May 28, 2012 02:56:44 PM Dan Vratil wrote:
> > libgapi might lead confusion with the glib world.
>
> As libwebkit lead to confusion since it seems that it is toolkig agnostic.
>
> libgapi seems ok to me.
I'm sorry, but unless the
On Monday, May 28, 2012 02:56:44 PM Dan Vratil wrote:
> libgapi might lead confusion with the glib world.
As libwebkit lead to confusion since it seems that it is toolkig agnostic.
libgapi seems ok to me.
On Monday 28 of May 2012 14:40:56 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> On Monday, May 28, 2012 02:19:12 PM Dan Vratil wrote:
> > The omniscient interwebs suggested libkgapi (derived from libmapi, library
> > for interfacing with Microsoft's Exchange API).
> >
> > I think the "G" is completely safe, yet makes hin
On Monday, May 28, 2012 02:19:12 PM Dan Vratil wrote:
> The omniscient interwebs suggested libkgapi (derived from libmapi, library
> for interfacing with Microsoft's Exchange API).
>
> I think the "G" is completely safe, yet makes hint about what service is the
> library related to.
Since we are r
On Monday 28 of May 2012 14:21:36 Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > Hmm, can really just the word "google" be considered a TM?
>
> I would personally ask this question differently: in order to feel
> safe, can you please prove that it is safe to use ? I recall I had a
> wrapper library for OpenAL, and I even
> Hmm, can really just the word "google" be considered a TM?
I would personally ask this question differently: in order to feel
safe, can you please prove that it is safe to use ? I recall I had a
wrapper library for OpenAL, and I even had to rename that to Audio3D
instead of QtOpenAL (I know it i
On Saturday 26 of May 2012 19:20:04 John Layt wrote:
> On Saturday 26 May 2012 00:47:04 Dan Vratil wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > LibKGoogle is a new optional dependency of kdepim-runtime. It's used by
> > the
> > new Akonadi Google resources.
> >
> > It's now in kdereview [0] and I'd like to move it to
El Dissabte, 26 de maig de 2012, a les 17:23:13, Dan Vratil va escriure:
> On Saturday 26 of May 2012 11:42:41 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> > Dan Vratil writes:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > LibKGoogle is a new optional dependency of kdepim-runtime. It's used by
> > > the
> > > new Akonadi Google resou
On Saturday 26 of May 2012 11:42:41 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> Dan Vratil writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > LibKGoogle is a new optional dependency of kdepim-runtime. It's used by
> > the
> > new Akonadi Google resources.
> >
> > It's now in kdereview [0] and I'd like to move it to extragear, so I'm
>
On Saturday 26 May 2012 00:47:04 Dan Vratil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> LibKGoogle is a new optional dependency of kdepim-runtime. It's used by the
> new Akonadi Google resources.
>
> It's now in kdereview [0] and I'd like to move it to extragear, so I'm
> asking for a review on the library.
>
> Thanks
>
Dan Vratil writes:
> Hi,
>
> LibKGoogle is a new optional dependency of kdepim-runtime. It's used by the
> new Akonadi Google resources.
>
> It's now in kdereview [0] and I'd like to move it to extragear, so I'm asking
> for a review on the library.
One thing I have noticed is that libkgoogle se
On Saturday, May 26, 2012 00:47:04 Dan Vratil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> LibKGoogle is a new optional dependency of kdepim-runtime. It's used by the
> new Akonadi Google resources.
>
> It's now in kdereview [0] and I'd like to move it to extragear, so I'm
> asking for a review on the library.
i haven't lo
Hi,
LibKGoogle is a new optional dependency of kdepim-runtime. It's used by the
new Akonadi Google resources.
It's now in kdereview [0] and I'd like to move it to extragear, so I'm asking
for a review on the library.
Thanks
Dan
[0] https://projects.kde.org/projects/kdereview/libkgoogle/repos
21 matches
Mail list logo
