There is an existing page about slitting runtime here:
http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Epics/New_Runtime_Organization
linked to from http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Epics
Alex's wiki page looks far more populated.
We should make sure we avoid wiki duplication.
David
I don't clearly understand why KUriFilter-Plugins should go to plasma-
workspace. I noticed KUriFilter is defined in kio and its plugins are used
e.g. in kparts (browserextension). Shouldn't these go to kio?
2014/1/22 Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org
On Tuesday 21 January 2014 12:05:26 Antonis
In the plasma sprint we have done a session to plan what we are going to do
with kde-workspace/kde-runtime repositories, here is the proposal we came
with.
We are going to create 2 new repos called plasma-desktop and
plasma-workspace, we decided to use plasma as a prefix so in the future we
On Tuesday 21 January 2014 13:12:58 David Hubner wrote:
In the plasma sprint we have done a session to plan what we are going to
do
with kde-workspace/kde-runtime repositories, here is the proposal we came
with.
We are going to create 2 new repos called plasma-desktop and
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 11:03:57 Bhushan Shah wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 1:19 AM, Àlex Fiestas afies...@kde.org wrote:
In the plasma sprint we have done a session to plan what we are going to
do
with kde-workspace/kde-runtime repositories, here is the proposal we came
with.
1) Create two different groups named plasma-workspace and
plasma-desktop like frameworks
2) Split out every component into individual repos
3) Assign repos to the related group.
Advantages:
1) Easy to assign maintainer to individual component.
2) If we split only some repos, we can not
Hello!
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 1:19 AM, Àlex Fiestas afies...@kde.org wrote:
In the plasma sprint we have done a session to plan what we are going to do
with kde-workspace/kde-runtime repositories, here is the proposal we came
with.
We are going to create 2 new repos called plasma-desktop
Hello!
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Antonis Tsiapaliokas kok...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that splitting each individual component to its own repo might be a
bit confusing. Because if we don't have two groups (plasma-desktop and plasma-
workspace), then we will not be able to provide
On Tuesday 21 January 2014 13:04:22 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
1) Create two different groups named plasma-workspace and
plasma-desktop like frameworks
How is this granularity useful? To me, it sounds like way too much, too hard
to move code around within the same domain, for example. We
In the plasma sprint we have done a session to plan what we are going to do
with kde-workspace/kde-runtime repositories, here is the proposal we came
with.
We are going to create 2 new repos called plasma-desktop and plasma-workspace,
we decided to use plasma as a prefix so in the future we can
10 matches
Mail list logo
