Re: [Kde-pim] Who relies on Soprano::Model::statement[s]Added|Removed signals?

2011-10-05 Thread Vishesh Handa
Well now we know one of the reasons for Nepomuk hogging a lot of CPU. Those signals were horribly inefficient. On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:27 PM, laurent Montel wrote: > There is a HOWTO to explain how to convert it ? > > Nope. I could write one. I suppose. It seems fairly intuitive to me, but the

Re: [Kde-pim] Who relies on Soprano::Model::statement[s]Added|Removed signals?

2011-10-05 Thread laurent Montel
Le Wednesday 5 October 2011 08:55:08 Volker Krause a écrit : > On Friday 30 September 2011 13:36:22 Sebastian Trüg wrote: > > Hi lists, > > > > with frameworks in the building and Nepomuk probably going that > > direction already for 4.8 I would like to clean up a bit. One of these > > cleanup tas

Re: Who relies on Soprano::Model::statement[s]Added|Removed signals?

2011-10-05 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Wednesday 05 October 2011 Oct, Volker Krause wrote: > On Friday 30 September 2011 13:36:22 Sebastian Trüg wrote: > > Hi lists, > > > > with frameworks in the building and Nepomuk probably going that > > direction already for 4.8 I would like to clean up a bit. One of these > > cleanup tasks tar

Re: Who relies on Soprano::Model::statement[s]Added|Removed signals?

2011-10-05 Thread Volker Krause
On Friday 30 September 2011 13:36:22 Sebastian Trüg wrote: > Hi lists, > > with frameworks in the building and Nepomuk probably going that > direction already for 4.8 I would like to clean up a bit. One of these > cleanup tasks targets the Soprano::Model statement signals. So far these > were the o

Re: Re: Who relies on Soprano::Model::statement[s]Added|Removed signals?

2011-09-30 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Divendres, 30 de setembre de 2011, Sebastian Trüg vàreu escriure: > of course this is for the frameworks thingi. Oh, sorry for the misinterpretation. Albert > > On 09/30/2011 07:09 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote: > > On 2011-09-30, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > >> A Divendres, 30 de setembre de 2011, S

Re: Who relies on Soprano::Model::statement[s]Added|Removed signals?

2011-09-30 Thread Sebastian Trüg
of course this is for the frameworks thingi. On 09/30/2011 07:09 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2011-09-30, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> A Divendres, 30 de setembre de 2011, Sebastian Trüg vàreu escriure: >>> Hi lists, >>> >>> with frameworks in the building and Nepomuk probably going that >>> direc

Re: Who relies on Soprano::Model::statement[s]Added|Removed signals?

2011-09-30 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2011-09-30, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > A Divendres, 30 de setembre de 2011, Sebastian Trüg vàreu escriure: >> Hi lists, >> >> with frameworks in the building and Nepomuk probably going that >> direction already for 4.8 I would like to clean up a bit. One of these >> cleanup tasks targets the S

Re: Who relies on Soprano::Model::statement[s]Added|Removed signals?

2011-09-30 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Divendres, 30 de setembre de 2011, Sebastian Trüg vàreu escriure: > Hi lists, > > with frameworks in the building and Nepomuk probably going that > direction already for 4.8 I would like to clean up a bit. One of these > cleanup tasks targets the Soprano::Model statement signals. So far these >

Re: Who relies on Soprano::Model::statement[s]Added|Removed signals?

2011-09-30 Thread Sebastian Trüg
On 09/30/2011 01:56 PM, Alex Merry wrote: > On 30/09/11 12:36, Sebastian Trüg wrote: >> I would like to anyone using the "old" API to change to the new >> ResourceWatcher as soon as possible because I would like to disable the >> old signals soon. They simply entail to many problems and clutter the

Re: Who relies on Soprano::Model::statement[s]Added|Removed signals?

2011-09-30 Thread Alex Merry
On 30/09/11 12:36, Sebastian Trüg wrote: I would like to anyone using the "old" API to change to the new ResourceWatcher as soon as possible because I would like to disable the old signals soon. They simply entail to many problems and clutter the API. You might want to contact developers using

Who relies on Soprano::Model::statement[s]Added|Removed signals?

2011-09-30 Thread Sebastian Trüg
Hi lists, with frameworks in the building and Nepomuk probably going that direction already for 4.8 I would like to clean up a bit. One of these cleanup tasks targets the Soprano::Model statement signals. So far these were the only way to get informed about changes in Nepomuk - with a very bad imp