On 03/23/2011 03:41 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 23, 2011, johnm_s2 wrote:
>> I'm developing a plasma applet & I need to store about 500k-2MB of per
>> instance data. I'm guessing KConfig / KConfigGroup would not be a good
>> idea for this much data..?
>
> aside from what sebas
working on a Solaris 10 port of KDE4.6, but have no experience working
with xrandr.
Does someone have a hint they can throw in my direction to fix or
workaround this.
According to the config, I have xrandr-1.2
[ 0%] Built target kcm_randr_automoc
[ 0%] Building CXX object kcontrol/randr/CMakeFi
On Wednesday 23 Mar 2011 00:21:23 jam wrote:
> Guys, without starting a flame war, the whole nepomuk shebang ruined the
> best mailer around.
>
> [info] I use gnome not kde. Every single time I start kmail on any of my
> machines I need to start kmail twice. Once with 'nepomuk not
> running' [repo
On Wednesday, March 23, 2011, johnm_s2 wrote:
> I'm developing a plasma applet & I need to store about 500k-2MB of per
> instance data. I'm guessing KConfig / KConfigGroup would not be a good
> idea for this much data..?
aside from what sebas said, i'd just add that hopefully you are using a
Data
Hi,
On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 01:21:23 jam wrote:
> Guys, without starting a flame war, the whole nepomuk shebang ruined the
> best mailer around.
If you don't want a flamewar started, why are you being so polarizing?
> [info] I use gnome not kde. Every single time I start kmail on any of my
On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 05:50:13 johnm_s2 wrote:
> I'm developing a plasma applet & I need to store about 500k-2MB of per
> instance data. I'm guessing KConfig / KConfigGroup would not be a good
> idea for this much data..?
>
> A flat file would work. Can I get Plasma:: to generate a unique/i
