---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104973/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Description
---
When
Hey
I just thought everyone should know what's going on with Nepomuk.
As per 4.9, we are going to have 3 repositories -
* nepomuk-core [1]
* nepomuk-kde-kio [2]
* nepomuk-kde-config [3]
kde-runtime/nepomuk will be removed. Kdelibs will not be touched. All the
headers are being installed under
Forgot to add the correct kde-packagers email.
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote:
Hey
I just thought everyone should know what's going on with Nepomuk.
As per 4.9, we are going to have 3 repositories -
* nepomuk-core [1]
* nepomuk-kde-kio [2]
*
On April 26, 2012, 5:09 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
If i understand you correctly you are suggesting to create a bug (option
that does nothing)?
Doesn't make much sense.
Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
Huh ? I do not follow. By option that does nothing you mean this change
by
El Dijous, 17 de maig de 2012, a les 19:31:14, Vishesh Handa va escriure:
Hey
@Translators: You probably want to preserve the translations in
kde-runtime/nepomuk. How do we go about this?
That's not a problem.
Albert
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104974/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Description
---
Only scan the list of
On 2012-05-17, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote:
@Packagers: We will not be maintaining binary compatibility in
nepomuk-core. At least not for KDE 4.10. We still need to break a lot of
things.
NACK.
this is a completely no go.
/Sune
I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are the DBus
interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are
supposed to be used instead of the dbus interfaces...
On 05/17/2012 09:19 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2012-05-17, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote:
On 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org wrote:
I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are the DBus
interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are
supposed to be used instead of the dbus interfaces...
Great. thanks.
hugs and kisses
/Sune
On
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote:
On 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org wrote:
I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are the DBus
interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are
supposed to be used instead
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104974/#review13944
---
This review has been submitted with commit
Hey
I just thought everyone should know what's going on with Nepomuk.
As per 4.9, we are going to have 3 repositories -
* nepomuk-core [1]
* nepomuk-kde-kio [2]
* nepomuk-kde-config [3]
kde-runtime/nepomuk will be removed. Kdelibs will not be touched. All the
headers are being installed under
Forgot to add the correct kde-packagers email.
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote:
Hey
I just thought everyone should know what's going on with Nepomuk.
As per 4.9, we are going to have 3 repositories -
* nepomuk-core [1]
* nepomuk-kde-kio [2]
*
On Thursday 17 May 2012 10:01:14 AM Vishesh Handa wrote:
Hey
I just thought everyone should know what's going on with Nepomuk.
As per 4.9, we are going to have 3 repositories -
* nepomuk-core [1]
* nepomuk-kde-kio [2]
* nepomuk-kde-config [3]
kde-runtime/nepomuk will be removed.
El Dijous, 17 de maig de 2012, a les 19:31:14, Vishesh Handa va escriure:
Hey
@Translators: You probably want to preserve the translations in
kde-runtime/nepomuk. How do we go about this?
That's not a problem.
Albert
Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe
15 matches
Mail list logo