---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118844/
---
(Updated June 23, 2014, 6:28 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118844/#review60748
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118846/#review60749
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118846/
---
(Updated June 23, 2014, 6:30 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Wednesday 04 June 2014 10:31:28 Marko Käning wrote:
Turns out thought that these aren’t all yet, since two frameworks (khtml
ktexteditor) actually place their stuff outside of the actually configured
kf5 subdirectory: ---
which is probably unintended! Can this be considered a glitch of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118889/#review60771
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Edmundson
On June 22, 2014,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118889/#review60772
---
What about bringing this to VdG? They can come up with a more
On June 23, 2014, 10:34 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
What about bringing this to VdG? They can come up with a more integrated
new design for the about dialog.
For the moment, I'm good with just changing the picture, but I wouldn't
like to leave it there.
Marco Martin wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118852/#review60776
---
Isn't that same uses breaking when using kconfig then?
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118889/#review60783
---
Sorry for hijacking this review, but I think we need the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118889/#review60784
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Sebastian Kügler
On June 22, 2014,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118889/#review60786
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118889/
---
(Updated June 23, 2014, 11:33 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118366/#review60787
---
Can you please try to generate a proper diff? The one you
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118366/
---
(Updated June 23, 2014, 1:46 p.m.)
Review request for kde-workspace, KDE
As many of you know late in the game I started writing some new code to add
much needed asynchronous api to Solid/Power which meant moving the old
deprecate code to kdelibs4Support.
The new API is done (you can review it on master, there are 2 CMake options to
enable them) and all is left to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118906/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Plasma.
Repository:
Hello,
On Monday 23 June 2014 17:56:20 Àlex Fiestas wrote:
As many of you know late in the game I started writing some new code to add
much needed asynchronous api to Solid/Power which meant moving the old
deprecate code to kdelibs4Support.
The new API is done (you can review it on master,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118909/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks, kwin and Eike Hein.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118909/#review60843
---
What about (non override) utility windows (eg. assume Qt
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118852/#review60850
---
autotests/kconfigtest.cpp
On June 23, 2014, 10:08 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
What about (non override) utility windows (eg. assume Qt would not set
floating dock override to bring its own titlebar)?
While kwin (iirc by default) hides them for inactive windows, that's rather
a feature.
- By their nature,
On June 21, 2014, 9:36 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
What is the status of categorized debugging/logging support in Qt, and how
do we utilize that in our frameworks?
If we are still simply using uncategorized qDebug(), please commit it.
Luigi Toscano wrote:
We can use qCDebug;
On June 21, 2014, 11:36 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
What is the status of categorized debugging/logging support in Qt, and how
do we utilize that in our frameworks?
If we are still simply using uncategorized qDebug(), please commit it.
Luigi Toscano wrote:
We can use qCDebug;
On June 23, 2014, 8:28 a.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Out of curiosity: why is it necessary to skip colors with spaces?
I guess it's a heuristic to remove duplicate entries for same {R,G,B}. However,
it doesn't work perfectly, e.g. we have two entries navy and NavyBlue for
the same RGB={0,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118851/#review60757
---
Hmm, now we seem to have a strange situation between KDE4 and
On June 23, 2014, 9:16 a.m., Raymond Wooninck wrote:
Hmm, now we seem to have a strange situation between KDE4 and KF5/PN.
The latest version of libkonq with KDE4 is 5.14.0 (libkonq.so.5.14.0)
with libkonq.so.5 pointing to it.
With this change libkonq has a lower version
On June 23, 2014, 9:16 a.m., Raymond Wooninck wrote:
Hmm, now we seem to have a strange situation between KDE4 and KF5/PN.
The latest version of libkonq with KDE4 is 5.14.0 (libkonq.so.5.14.0)
with libkonq.so.5 pointing to it.
With this change libkonq has a lower version
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118366/#review60787
---
Can you please try to generate a proper diff? The one you
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118898/
---
Review request for kde-workspace, Plasma and Marcel Wiesweg.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118898/#review60795
---
I think there's a couple of problems with this approach:
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118366/
---
(Updated June 23, 2014, 1:46 p.m.)
Review request for kde-workspace, KDE
On June 23, 2014, 3:21 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
I think there's a couple of problems with this approach:
- This slows down startup for everybody, not just those who changed the
setting. I'm not super-familiar with this, but isn't kcminit for this
use-case?
- Changing startup
On June 23, 2014, 3:21 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
I think there's a couple of problems with this approach:
- This slows down startup for everybody, not just those who changed the
setting. I'm not super-familiar with this, but isn't kcminit for this
use-case?
- Changing startup
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118898/#review60809
---
kcmkgamma/init_kgamma.cpp
Hi all
The KXStitch application has been in review for a few weeks now. Albert
identified a few minor issues that have now been fixed.
If there is no more feedback, I would like to request KXStitch is moved
to Extragear/Graphics. I'll submit a ticket in a couple of days but if
anyone
Hi all
The SymbolEditor application has been in review for a few weeks now.
Albert identified a few minor issues that have now been fixed.
If there is no more feedback, I would like to request SymbolEditor is
moved to Extragear/Graphics. I'll submit a ticket in a couple of days
but if
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118898/
---
(Updated June 23, 2014, 7:01 p.m.)
Review request for kde-workspace,
On June 23, 2014, 3:21 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
I think there's a couple of problems with this approach:
- This slows down startup for everybody, not just those who changed the
setting. I'm not super-familiar with this, but isn't kcminit for this
use-case?
- Changing startup
On June 23, 2014, 5:13 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
kcmkgamma/init_kgamma.cpp, lines 1-8
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118898/diff/1/?file=283881#file283881line1
please use a copyright header as in
http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Licensing_Policy#GPL_Header
I just copied the
On June 23, 2014, 5:13 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
kcmkgamma/init_kgamma.cpp, line 39
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118898/diff/1/?file=283881#file283881line39
why delete config? I would just use a KSharedConfig::openConfig
Wolfgang Bauer wrote:
I just copy/pasted the
On June 23, 2014, 5:13 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
kcmkgamma/init_kgamma.cpp, line 39
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118898/diff/1/?file=283881#file283881line39
why delete config? I would just use a KSharedConfig::openConfig
Wolfgang Bauer wrote:
I just copy/pasted the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118898/#review60866
---
Not sure why you added Marcel to the list of reviewers...
On June 23, 2014, 10:41 p.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
Not sure why you added Marcel to the list of reviewers...
Anyway, if the current patch is all that is needed to restore sanity as in
KDE 3, the I am all for getting it fixed.
(And if the same issue was the cause for the KRandR
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 01:08:46 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
did you try running plasma-desktop or plasmoidviewer through gdb to get a
backtrace?
Crashes in plasmoidviewer, but no debug symbols or stack trace.
Would kde-runtime-dbg be the one to install?
--
Lindsay
signature.asc
Description:
On Monday, June 23, 2014 21:28:26 Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 01:08:46 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
did you try running plasma-desktop or plasmoidviewer through gdb to get a
backtrace?
Crashes in plasmoidviewer, but no debug symbols or stack trace.
Would kde-runtime-dbg
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 01:54:02 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Crashes in plasmoidviewer, but no debug symbols or stack trace.
Would kde-runtime-dbg be the one to install?
Yes, possibly kdelibs*dbg and kde-workspace*dbg as well, and perhaps Qt*dbg.
installed,
kde-runtime-dbg
On Montag, 23. Juni 2014 14:22:46 CEST, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
installed,
kde-runtime-dbg
kde-workspace-dbg
kdelibs5-dbg
Unfortunately, still no debug info
You mean no Dr. Konqui?
- run plasma-* in gdb
gdb --args plasma-desktop 21 | tee plasma-desktop.dbg
(gdb) run
Program
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 02:35:31 PM Thomas Lübking wrote:
Unfortunately, still no debug info
You mean no Dr. Konqui?
Nope, I mean gdb reports not debug info.
gdb plasmoidviewer
...
Reading symbols from plasmoidviewer...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
(gdb) run digital-clock
Starting
On Montag, 23. Juni 2014 14:46:45 CEST, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 02:35:31 PM Thomas Lübking wrote:
Unfortunately, still no debug info
You mean no Dr. Konqui?
Nope, I mean gdb reports not debug info.
gdb plasmoidviewer
--nofork (not sure whether plasmoidviewer does and
On Montag, 23. Juni 2014 22:55:47 CEST, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 03:00:26 PM Thomas Lübking wrote:
On Montag, 23. Juni 2014 14:46:45 CEST, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: ...
I tried plasmoidviewer and plasma-desktop with --nofork, but no
debug info for either.
You get the No
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:04:00 PM Thomas Lübking wrote:
I tried plasmoidviewer and plasma-desktop with --nofork, but no
debug info for either.
You get the No stack output from
gdb --args plasma-desktop --nofork
???
No idea what could cause that (except nofork being broken - there'd
On 24/06/2014, at 7:18 AM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:04:00 PM Thomas Lübking wrote:
I tried plasmoidviewer and plasma-desktop with --nofork, but no
debug info for either.
You get the No stack output from
gdb --args plasma-desktop --nofork
???
No idea what
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118801/
---
(Updated June 23, 2014, 6:14 p.m.)
Review request for Solid.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118801/
---
(Updated June 23, 2014, 4:47 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On June 23, 2014, 6:47 p.m., Commit Hook wrote:
This review has been submitted with commit
775a99e8bc1e9c5e277ff17a84a406227a5a32fb by Emmanuel Pescosta to branch
KDE/4.11.
I'll create a patch for kde:powerdevil when I have some time again, maybe this
weekend or in the end of next
56 matches
Mail list logo
