Re: Re: KDE backward compatibility issue

2015-02-04 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Wednesday 04 February 2015 22:15:54 Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Milian Wolff wrote: > > "Every application"? You mention two. > > Well, at least these two are affected. I can also mention tuxguitar > which uses Java and SWT, however I don't care about its tray ic

Re: Help solving this month's "Bug of the Month"

2015-02-04 Thread Martin Sandsmark
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 09:51:53PM +0100, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Even if it's an upstream bug, in my opinion the BugOfTheMonth+GardeningEffort > is showing the users that we care, and if they are affected by a severe bug > we're going to try to make as much as we can to fix it, not just toss

Re: Help solving this month's "Bug of the Month"

2015-02-04 Thread Christoph Feck
On Wednesday 04 February 2015 21:51:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dimecres, 4 de febrer de 2015, a les 18:06:23, Martin Sandsmark > va > > escriure: > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:45:26PM +0100, Christoph Feck wrote: > > > According to recent comments, this is bug is still reproducible > > > fo

Re: Help solving this month's "Bug of the Month"

2015-02-04 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimecres, 4 de febrer de 2015, a les 18:06:23, Martin Sandsmark va escriure: > On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:45:26PM +0100, Christoph Feck wrote: > > According to recent comments, this is bug is still reproducible for > > some users, but not for others. It is unclear if the actual issue is > > in

Re: KDE backward compatibility issue

2015-02-04 Thread Vasily Khoruzhick
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Milian Wolff wrote: > "Every application"? You mention two. Well, at least these two are affected. I can also mention tuxguitar which uses Java and SWT, however I don't care about its tray icon. > And if they, or others, don't care about > us, why should we go o

Re: KDE backward compatibility issue

2015-02-04 Thread Milian Wolff
On Wednesday 04 February 2015 21:49:15 Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > Hi Milian, > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Milian Wolff wrote: > > If these apps link against Qt5 statically (which they can, assuming they > > pay the license fees to Digia), then they will need to recompile and > > release an

Re: KDE backward compatibility issue

2015-02-04 Thread Vasily Khoruzhick
Hi Milian, On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Milian Wolff wrote: > > If these apps link against Qt5 statically (which they can, assuming they pay > the license fees to Digia), then they will need to recompile and release an > updated version. If otoh they just ship they own set of libs and adapt >

Re: KDE backward compatibility issue

2015-02-04 Thread Milian Wolff
On Wednesday 04 February 2015 20:42:53 Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > There are patches for Qt < 5.4 around which are have been shipped by > > various distributions for quite some time. Martin's blog, which you > > linked f

Re: KDE backward compatibility issue

2015-02-04 Thread Vasily Khoruzhick
Hi Sebastian, On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > There are patches for Qt < 5.4 around which are have been shipped by various > distributions for quite some time. Martin's blog, which you linked from your > initial email, links them: > > http://blog.martin-graesslin.com/b

Re: KDE backward compatibility issue

2015-02-04 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Friday, January 30, 2015 13:41:42 Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > There're some proprietary applications using xembed tray and Qt5 < > 5.4, for example - dropbox and viber. There's no way to fix them. There are patches for Qt < 5.4 around which are have been shipped by various distributions for qui

Re: Help solving this month's "Bug of the Month"

2015-02-04 Thread Martin Sandsmark
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:45:26PM +0100, Christoph Feck wrote: > According to recent comments, this is bug is still reproducible for > some users, but not for others. It is unclear if the actual issue is > in KDE software, Qt libraries, xorg libraries, or the keyboard layout > definition files.

Re: Review Request 120939: [OS X] turn baloo services into proper background "agents" and use IOPOL_THROTTLE for lower priority IO

2015-02-04 Thread René J . V . Bertin
> On Nov. 19, 2014, 11:15 a.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: > > Hey. Thanks a lot for doing this. I didn't manage to have a look at it over > > the last 2 weeks. > > > > I don't think we're going to be having any more releases for Baloo for > > KDE4. If you want I can forward port this to Qt5? > > R

Re: Review Request 117436: Doesn't assume that the users home directory is under /home

2015-02-04 Thread Vishesh Handa
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117436/#review75426 --- Ship it! I seem to have forgotten about this. Sorry. Do you

Re: Review Request 120438: improve baloo file indexing overhead by ~2.5x

2015-02-04 Thread Vishesh Handa
> On Oct. 14, 2014, 10:50 a.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: > > Oh, also. You might want to rebase your patch on top of master. Many things > > have changed. > > Vishesh Handa wrote: > Ping? In Baloo, we're currently in the process of moving away from both xapian and sqlite. This patch is no lon

Re: Review Request 119441: Akonadi-Indexer: Collection indexing

2015-02-04 Thread Vishesh Handa
> On Aug. 7, 2014, 4:57 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: > > src/pim/agent/collectionindexer.cpp, line 89 > > > > > > Be careful with this. Indexing phrases nearly doubles the size of the > > index. Considering the amo

Re: Review Request 117829: do not raise unknown signal on windows

2015-02-04 Thread Patrick Spendrin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117829/ --- (Updated Feb. 4, 2015, 4:09 p.m.) Status -- This change has been dis

Re: Review Request 117829: do not raise unknown signal on windows

2015-02-04 Thread Vishesh Handa
> On April 28, 2014, 12:42 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: > > src/file/autotest/fileindexingjob/extractor.cpp, line 76 > > > > > > Wouldn't exit just terminate the process normally? I was hoping to > > simulate a cra

Re: Review Request 120939: [OS X] turn baloo services into proper background "agents" and use IOPOL_THROTTLE for lower priority IO

2015-02-04 Thread Vishesh Handa
> On Nov. 19, 2014, 10:15 a.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: > > Hey. Thanks a lot for doing this. I didn't manage to have a look at it over > > the last 2 weeks. > > > > I don't think we're going to be having any more releases for Baloo for > > KDE4. If you want I can forward port this to Qt5? > > R

Help solving this month's "Bug of the Month"

2015-02-04 Thread Christoph Feck
Hi developers! The KDE Gardening Team nominates one particular annoying bug as “The Bug of the Month”, see https://community.kde.org/Gardening This time, we need someone who can investigate a problem with keyboard shortcuts when a certain order of keyboard layouts is used: https://bugs.kde.org/