Re: Clarification on licenses and use of MPLv2 in GPLv3+ software

2020-11-23 Thread Johnny Jazeix
!hi Andreas, Thank you! I've read the different threads about the REUSE statements but didn't took the time to check how much work was needed to apply it to GCompris. I've created a task in our backlog to not forget about it: https://phabricator.kde.org/T13895 Johnny Le lun. 23 nov. 2020 à

Re: Clarification on licenses and use of MPLv2 in GPLv3+ software

2020-11-23 Thread Andreas Cord-Landwehr
Hi Johnny, I read it exactly the same way. So this looks completely fine to me. Yet, I would suggest to have a look at REUSE compatible license statements, which make it much easier to see which files are under which license. Even if one should not refer to oneself for reference, here is a

Clarification on licenses and use of MPLv2 in GPLv3+ software

2020-11-22 Thread Johnny Jazeix
Hi, GCompris is released under GPLv3+ license. We incorporated the code of a checkers engine under MPL2 licence (https://github.com/shubhendusaurabh/draughts.js). I would like to be sure that it does not change the licence of GCompris (or if we have to ask for a possible relicensing of the