On Monday 01 November 2010 18:02:20 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday, November 1, 2010, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > Sorry Aaron, we decided against it: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/3800/
>
> ah, didn't realize that was a "no, never" decision rather than a decision
> in this particular case (e.g. fo
On Monday, November 1, 2010, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> Sorry Aaron, we decided against it: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/3800/
ah, didn't realize that was a "no, never" decision rather than a decision in
this particular case (e.g. for the dashboard and similar windows). that's a
bit unfortunate as
On Monday 01 November 2010 09:12:22 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 27, 2010, Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > Am Wednesday 27 October 2010 schrieb v...@movingparts.net:
> > > So are you saying those Atoms won't be honored by the KDE4 taskbar
> > > either? Or are you saying that just KWin in
On Wednesday, October 27, 2010, Thomas Lübking wrote:
> Am Wednesday 27 October 2010 schrieb v...@movingparts.net:
> > So are you saying those Atoms won't be honored by the KDE4 taskbar
> > either? Or are you saying that just KWin in KDE4 ignores them?
>
> it's only ignored for the switcher. taskb