Bhushan Shah wrote:
I've worked on draft "move" of the current set of the repositories in
their respective subgroups at the repo-metadata project's branch [1].
You can browse the directory structure to get idea of how final
structure on Gitlab would look like.
No objection, just a request for
Bhushan Shah wrote:
I've worked on draft "move" of the current set of the repositories in
their respective subgroups at the repo-metadata project's branch [1].
You can browse the directory structure to get idea of how final
structure on Gitlab would look like.
No objection, just a request for
Bhushan Shah wrote:
I've worked on draft "move" of the current set of the repositories in
their respective subgroups at the repo-metadata project's branch [1].
You can browse the directory structure to get idea of how final
structure on Gitlab would look like.
No objection, just a request for
[Please keep sysad...@kde.org list or bs...@kde.org in the CC for
replies]
Hello Community members,
In view of upcoming Gitlab migration, we sysadmin team wants to share
the recommended structuring for the repositories on Gitlab.
We had multiple options,
- Flat structure: In this option we
[Please keep sysad...@kde.org list or bs...@kde.org in the CC for
replies]
Hello Community members,
In view of upcoming Gitlab migration, we sysadmin team wants to share
the recommended structuring for the repositories on Gitlab.
We had multiple options,
- Flat structure: In this option we
[Please keep sysad...@kde.org list or bs...@kde.org in the CC for
replies]
Hello Community members,
In view of upcoming Gitlab migration, we sysadmin team wants to share
the recommended structuring for the repositories on Gitlab.
We had multiple options,
- Flat structure: In this option we
201 - 206 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
