[kde-doc-english]KSirc documentation queries

2002-04-17 Thread Philip Rodrigues
Hi all, I've just committed an update to the KSirc documentation to bring it up-to-date with KDE 3. I've got just a few queries: The previous version of the documentation is not up-to-date with KDE 3, so does that mean my documentation should be backported to the 3.0.1 branch? There are some ch

[kde-doc-english]KSirc documentation queries

2002-04-17 Thread Paul E Ahlquist Jr
On Wednesday 17 April 2002 17:50, Paul E Ahlquist Jr wrote: >xreflabel="Nickname Completion"> > Nickname Completion.. The xreflabel is redundant here. It is useful where you want different "See: topic" text than what would be generated automaticly. -- Paul Ahlquist 319E 1969 C476

[kde-doc-english]KSirc documentation queries

2002-04-17 Thread Paul E Ahlquist Jr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 17 April 2002 16:11, Philip Rodrigues wrote: > I want to put an in the section about nick > completion, which is a , so that I can put an > to it later. However, I've had trouble finding a place to put it so > that meinproc won't complai

[kde-doc-english]kdegraphics/kdvi

2002-04-17 Thread Éric Bischoff
On Wednesday 17 April 2002 11:03, Thomas Diehl wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 17. April 2002 10:04 schrieb ?ric Bischoff: > > > If we start fixing all the "small things that would make another thing > > > clearer" we would invite the addition of tons of new strings. > > > > OK. But in the same message I rep

[kde-doc-english]kdegraphics/kdvi

2002-04-17 Thread Thomas Diehl
Am Mittwoch, 17. April 2002 10:04 schrieb ?ric Bischoff: > > If we start fixing all the "small things that would make another thing > > clearer" we would invite the addition of tons of new strings. > > OK. But in the same message I report two "real mistakes" : > - "paper.dvi" instead of "paper.tex

[kde-doc-english]kdegraphics/kdvi

2002-04-17 Thread Éric Bischoff
On Wednesday 17 April 2002 09:11, Thomas Diehl wrote: > > Well, Thomas says (...) Sorry, I did not know you were reading this mailing list, Thomas ;-) > If we start fixing all the "small things that would make another thing > clearer" we would invite the addition of tons of new strings. OK. But

[kde-doc-english]kdegraphics/kdvi

2002-04-17 Thread Thomas Diehl
Am Wednesday, 17. April 2002 08:25 schrieb ?ric Bischoff: > Since the branch is for corrections, I think this kind of things should > be done both in head and in the branch. After all, it's corrections, not > new features, right? Did I understand the official policy? What did > Thomas say about th

[kde-doc-english]kdegraphics/kdvi

2002-04-17 Thread Éric Bischoff
On Tuesday 16 April 2002 22:27, Lauri Watts wrote: > On Monday 15 April 2002 11.57, ?ric Bischoff wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Who can fix a few markup and content errors in kdvi ? Below is a list of > > things I've bumped on while translating : > > I fixed all the problems (from both your mails) exc