[kwave] /: prepared for next release, v0.9.3, at 2017-01-29

2017-01-06 Thread Thomas Eschenbacher
Git commit 85463c19f2b011ece59e920ac06c03f2fc749d39 by Thomas Eschenbacher. Committed on 06/01/2017 at 13:11. Pushed by eschenbacher into branch 'master'. prepared for next release, v0.9.3, at 2017-01-29 M +1-1CHANGES M +6-6README M +1-1VERSION M +5-5doc/en/ind

Re: [kwave] /: prepared for next release, v0.9.3, at 2017-01-29

2017-01-06 Thread Luigi Toscano
Thomas Eschenbacher ha scritto: > Git commit 85463c19f2b011ece59e920ac06c03f2fc749d39 by Thomas Eschenbacher. > Committed on 06/01/2017 at 13:11. > Pushed by eschenbacher into branch 'master'. > > prepared for next release, v0.9.3, at 2017-01-29 > > M +1-1CHANGES > M +6-6README

Re: [kwave] /: prepared for next release, v0.9.3, at 2017-01-29

2017-01-06 Thread Burkhard Lück
Hi Thomas, Am Freitag, 6. Januar 2017, 13:11:44 CET schrieb Thomas Eschenbacher: > -2016-06-26 > -0.9.2 (Applications 16.12) > +2017-01-29 > +0.9.3 > Please us the releaseinfo format as described in line 128 of https://commits.kde.org/kdoctools?path=src/template.docbook Thanks

Re: [kwave] /: prepared for next release, v0.9.3, at 2017-01-29

2017-01-08 Thread Thomas Eschenbacher
Hello Luigi, sorry, I didn't know about that! I searched through the KDE web sites, but found nothing about this topic. For the moment I reverted the change to the docbook file only. It is fine for me to follow the KDE release cycle and abandon the old/own release scheme. But, to be consequent,

Re: [kwave] /: prepared for next release, v0.9.3, at 2017-01-29

2017-01-08 Thread Burkhard Lück
Am Sonntag, 8. Januar 2017, 11:26:20 CET schrieb Thomas Eschenbacher: > 1) help_en.docbook > > -> is it ok and sufficient to just remove the old version, so that it > reads like this: > "Applications 16.12" ? > kwave has an own version and is released as Applications, so you should use the schem