On Sept. 19, 2012, 5:11 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
every single change of this patch is a regression
David Faure wrote:
Very encouraging, as always. Care to give us more details?
the reasons for kprocess' existence didn't go away, so every change away from
it is by definition a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106501/#review19241
---
kio/tests/krununittest.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105868/#review19247
---
Ship it!
Please commit, the current stuff (Q_OS in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105866/#review19248
---
Ship it!
cmake 2.8.9 has been released now, please commit.
-
On Sept. 19, 2012, 5:11 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
every single change of this patch is a regression
David Faure wrote:
Very encouraging, as always. Care to give us more details?
Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
the reasons for kprocess' existence didn't go away, so every change
2012/9/20 Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk:
On 2012-09-17, Dario Freddi drf54...@gmail.com wrote:
It really depends on what you want to achieve. If your goal is just
cleaning up the API and implementing the existing standard it might
work out, but for sure it won't just cut it for what I
