Build failed in Jenkins: kdelibs_frameworks_qt5 #352

2013-02-06 Thread KDE CI System
See Changes: [aseigo] libplasma is in its own repo now: plasma-framework [aseigo] plasma is moved to its own repo: plasma-framework [aseigo] if we build the cpp, install the header [aseigo] fix the path for the new location [aseigo

Separating everything ?

2013-02-06 Thread Alexander Neundorf
Hi, at Kevin's talk about KDE frameworks at FOSDEM last weekend, one guy from the audience asked why he should not use all KDE libs if he decides to use one already... This got me thinking. Obviously, dragging in everything is what we want to avoid. Making kdelibs modular should also make build

Re: Separating everything ?

2013-02-06 Thread Treeve Jelbert
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013 19:57:09 +0100, Alexander Neundorf wrote: Hi, at Kevin's talk about KDE frameworks at FOSDEM last weekend, one guy from the audience asked why he should not use all KDE libs if he decides to use one already... This got me thinking. Obviously, dragging in everything is what

Re: Separating everything ?

2013-02-06 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Wednesday 6 February 2013 20:12:49 Treeve Jelbert wrote: > Why not create tier{1,2} repos immediately, if they can build > standalone? We're still moving classes in there. It's not yet ready for splitting. Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://w

Re: Separating everything ?

2013-02-06 Thread Stephen Kelly
Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Wednesday 6 February 2013 20:12:49 Treeve Jelbert wrote: >> Why not create tier{1,2} repos immediately, if they can build >> standalone? > > We're still moving classes in there. It's not yet ready for splitting. Additionally, tier1 libraries might not remain tier1 librar

Re: Separating everything ?

2013-02-06 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, I was preparing a reply but you beat me to it again. But that's cool, I trashed it and now my own reply can be shorter. :-) On Wednesday 6 February 2013 23:04:48 Stephen Kelly wrote: > Kevin Ottens wrote: > > On Wednesday 6 February 2013 20:12:49 Treeve Jelbert wrote: > >> Why not create t

Re: Review Request 105868: KF5 - Q_OS_* not defined

2013-02-06 Thread Albert Astals Cid
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105868/#review26802 --- Has this been committed? It has Ship It! but still shows open i

Re: Review Request 105868: KF5 - Q_OS_* not defined

2013-02-06 Thread Andrius da Costa Ribas
> On Feb. 6, 2013, 11:14 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Has this been committed? It has Ship It! but still shows open in > > reviewboard. I'm currently having almost no time, I'd be grateful if someone commits it on behalf of me. - Andrius da Costa -