On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 08:58:57 +0100, Frank Reininghaus wrote:
Hi Patrick,
2013/2/8 Patrick Spendrin:
Am 07.02.2013 23:32, schrieb Frank Reininghaus:
...
Since I am reading this thread by chance, I might as well reply.
One of the reasons of splitting kdelibs into separate repositories
is to
Hi,
On Feb 8, 2013, at 02:07, Patrick Spendrin ps...@gmx.de wrote:
One of the reasons of splitting kdelibs into separate repositories is to
simplify the usage of single modules.
From the perspective of a full *KDE* desktop, there is no problem in
building using all of kdelibs, since each
On 2013-02-08, Mirko Boehm mi...@kde.org wrote:
As Frank said: I haven't seen any convincing argument yet why multiple
repositories are better.
+1.
There are several things here intermixed
1) is the release tarball layout
2) is the way the software is built
3) is the repository layout
all
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:13:31PM +0100, Mirko Boehm wrote:
I actually fail to see how splitting the libraries will make things
simpler. It does make handling the repositories harder, especially for
newcomers who have to learn a whole new (and unintuitive) side of git, as
Kevin said.
Well,
Hi,
On Feb 8, 2013, at 12:46, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote:
There are several things here intermixed
1) is the release tarball layout
2) is the way the software is built
3) is the repository layout
all of them is different things with different arguments for and
against.
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:10:20PM +0100, Mirko Boehm wrote:
I am mostly arguing that to achieve 1) and 2), we do not have to have 3), a
multi-repository structure. It can all be achieved by email.
Still leaves the fact that kdelibs currently is 188MB (and it is not going to
shrink) which is
On Friday 08 February 2013, David Faure wrote:
On Friday 08 February 2013 00:14:30 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
So, compared to kdelibs before, now FindKDE4Internal.cmake is no longer
installed.
Instead kdelibs now installs a KDELibs4Config.cmake, which (still)
contains most of what was in
On Friday 08 February 2013, Martin Sandsmark wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:10:20PM +0100, Mirko Boehm wrote:
I am mostly arguing that to achieve 1) and 2), we do not have to have 3),
a multi-repository structure. It can all be achieved by email.
Still leaves the fact that kdelibs
On Friday 08 February 2013, Martin Sandsmark wrote:
...
I honestly don't think most people are going to hack on many of the various
frameworks at the same time (and for those who plan to do that, the
procedure is pretty clearly documented and straight-forward).
This is what the horizontal
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105866/#review26997
---
What is the status of this? Was it commited and forgot to
On Friday 08 February 2013, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105866/#review26997
---
On Monday 04 February 2013, David Faure wrote:
On Monday 04 February 2013 09:09:25 Treeve Jelbert wrote:
On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 18:35:43 +0100, David Faure wrote:
On Sunday 03 February 2013 10:25:58 Treeve Jelbert wrote:
cmake/modules/FindKDE4Internal.cmake:find_package(Phonon 4.3.80)
12 matches
Mail list logo
