On Nov. 10, 2013, 10:54 a.m., David Faure wrote:
tier3/kconfigwidgets/src/kcolorscheme.h, line 596
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113685/diff/1/?file=210267#file210267line596
Wouldn't Oxygen be translated, normally?
If so, isn't this bad API, giving a translated name
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113685/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2013, 9:13 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks,
On Nov. 11, 2013, 5:28 p.m., David Faure wrote:
I'm not sure this is a good idea.
Yes, the spec for this (e.g. for app launchers) is only about unique apps,
but I still want to be able to start a konqueror instance
(org.kde.konqueror-12345) and then make a dbus call to have it open
On Nov. 12, 2013, 12:02 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
Maybe I've missed something, but I would like to have it explained somehow.
Why is it bad to define such values? How will g++ calls compare?
Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
In normal CMake, -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug builds without
On Nov. 12, 2013, 12:02 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
Maybe I've missed something, but I would like to have it explained somehow.
Why is it bad to define such values? How will g++ calls compare?
Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
In normal CMake, -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug builds without
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113685/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2013, 9:48 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113801/#review43503
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113801/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2013, 9:44 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113810/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and David Faure.
Repository: kdelibs
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113810/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2013, 10:10 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113260/#review43507
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113810/#review43509
---
Ship it!
Looks good to me, probably tasks should be created
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113796/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2013, 11:48 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113810/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2013, 11:51 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113816/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks, David Faure and Kevin Ottens.
This question is mainly directed at David Faure and Kevin Ottens, as the
authors of KDBusService, but to provide context for everyone else,
KDBusService implements (among other things) the D-Bus activation scheme
from the desktop entry spec
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113818/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Aurélien Gâteau.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113816/#review43523
---
Ship it!
Many thanks, this is good stuff.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113818/#review43524
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Maarten De Meyer
On Nov. 12, 2013,
On Tuesday 12 November 2013 13:40:06 Alex Merry wrote:
This question is mainly directed at David Faure and Kevin Ottens, as the
authors of KDBusService, but to provide context for everyone else,
KDBusService implements (among other things) the D-Bus activation scheme
from the desktop entry
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113818/#review43527
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On Nov. 12, 2013,
On Nov. 12, 2013, 3:31 p.m., David Faure wrote:
tier1/kdbusaddons/src/kdbusservice.h, line 61
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113816/diff/1/?file=212621#file212621line61
(not related to this commit, but this makes me re-read this paragraph,
and Thiago made me realize meanwhile
Hello everyone,
This is the minutes of the Week 46 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on
#kde-devel at 4pm Paris time.
Were present: afiestas, agateau, apol, dfaure, dMaggot, jpwhiting, mdemeyer,
mgraesslin, randomguy3, Riddell, sebas, svuorela and myself.
Announcement:
* I plan to open
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113816/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2013, 4:04 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113816/#review43529
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113818/#review43530
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113818/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2013, 4:06 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On 12/11/13 15:46, David Faure wrote:
On Tuesday 12 November 2013 13:40:06 Alex Merry wrote:
When the application is specified as being Unique, the KDBusService
constructor of a second instance will call Activate() on the first
instance and then quit. This means that any command line
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113506/#review43533
---
CMakeLists.txt
On Tuesday 12 November 2013 16:12:51 Alex Merry wrote:
Well, except that the desktop spec allows (and encourages) the
specification of an equivalent Exec line. So the idea would be that you
would, say, specify
[Desktop Action Foo]
Name=Do Foo
Exec=app --action=foo
and then KDBusService
On 12/11/13 17:17, David Faure wrote:
IOW, I would let the app handle this the way it wants.
It receives the command line, it gets the dbus calls via KDBusService, so it
can handle it all.
Which means we need a way to *let* the application deal with it like
that. As it stands, the
On Tuesday 12 November 2013 17:27:31 Alex Merry wrote:
On 12/11/13 17:17, David Faure wrote:
IOW, I would let the app handle this the way it wants.
It receives the command line, it gets the dbus calls via KDBusService, so
it can handle it all.
Which means we need a way to *let* the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113821/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and David Faure.
Repository: kdelibs
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113805/#review43538
---
IMO the patch as it is is not good.
Several things:
1) This
On Nov. 12, 2013, 12:02 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
Maybe I've missed something, but I would like to have it explained somehow.
Why is it bad to define such values? How will g++ calls compare?
Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
In normal CMake, -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug builds without
On Nov. 12, 2013, 7:24 p.m., Alexander Neundorf wrote:
IMO the patch as it is is not good.
Several things:
1) This file, is not mandatory at all with KDE frameworks.
You can build applications using KDE frameworks libraries without it. You
(the developer of the application) simply
On Monday 11 November 2013, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Sunday, November 3, 2013 20:51:57 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
I wanted to release ECM as fast as possible, since this was one of the
main points I got from the platform meeting in Randa in June 2011:
people want to be able to use cmake
On Monday 11 November 2013, Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:48 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Monday 11 November 2013 01:06:33 Michael Pyne wrote:
On Sun, November 10, 2013 20:11:07 David Faure wrote:
On Sunday 10 November 2013 13:44:09 Michael Pyne wrote:
I
On Sunday 10 November 2013, Kevin Ottens wrote:
Hello,
Since there's been several times discussions about having a kind of Tier
0 for building our frameworks containing what is right now in ECM
kde-modules directory, but the idea was never really on the table because
of the extra dependency
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113683/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks, Aleix Pol Gonzalez and Aurélien Gâteau.
On Nov. 12, 2013, 7:24 p.m., Alexander Neundorf wrote:
IMO the patch as it is is not good.
Several things:
1) This file, is not mandatory at all with KDE frameworks.
You can build applications using KDE frameworks libraries without it. You
(the developer of the application) simply
On 2013-11-11, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
would that work for everyone?
I don't think it solves the actual hard point:
Where should the final home for the stuff in ecm/kde-modules be ?
I'll like to reiterate what I suggested should happen with it:
KDEInstallDirs.cmake :
Keep it as
On Monday 11 November 2013, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
...
in my mind this allows:
* an immediate release of ecm
* allows KDE to back it rather than have ecm distanced from KDE
* this gives ecm a needed “reference customer”
* this gives KDE a first step into the “we’re a community
On Tuesday 12 November 2013 20:04:38 Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2013-11-11, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
would that work for everyone?
I don't think it solves the actual hard point:
Where should the final home for the stuff in ecm/kde-modules be ?
Agreed. Although that's from the KF5
On Nov. 12, 2013, 7:24 p.m., Alexander Neundorf wrote:
IMO the patch as it is is not good.
Several things:
1) This file, is not mandatory at all with KDE frameworks.
You can build applications using KDE frameworks libraries without it. You
(the developer of the application) simply
On Nov. 12, 2013, 7:24 p.m., Alexander Neundorf wrote:
IMO the patch as it is is not good.
Several things:
1) This file, is not mandatory at all with KDE frameworks.
You can build applications using KDE frameworks libraries without it. You
(the developer of the application) simply
On Nov. 12, 2013, 7:24 p.m., Alexander Neundorf wrote:
IMO the patch as it is is not good.
Several things:
1) This file, is not mandatory at all with KDE frameworks.
You can build applications using KDE frameworks libraries without it. You
(the developer of the application) simply
On Nov. 12, 2013, 7:24 p.m., Alexander Neundorf wrote:
IMO the patch as it is is not good.
Several things:
1) This file, is not mandatory at all with KDE frameworks.
You can build applications using KDE frameworks libraries without it. You
(the developer of the application) simply
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113683/#review43555
---
Ship it!
No, if it works just push it.
- Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On Sunday 10 November 2013, Kevin Ottens wrote:
Hello,
Since there's been several times discussions about having a kind of Tier
0 for building our frameworks containing what is right now in ECM
kde-modules directory, but the idea was never really on the table because
of the extra dependency
On Tuesday 12 November 2013, Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Tuesday 12 November 2013 20:04:38 Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2013-11-11, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
would that work for everyone?
I don't think it solves the actual hard point:
Where should the final home for the stuff in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113825/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kdelibs
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113827/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kdelibs
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113685/#review43557
---
About the .colors translations, we have this
This is in relation to https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113798/
Basically, KDBusService, which handles (among other things) unique
applications, needs to deal with startup notification. It both needs to
get the existing startup notification info if it is a duplicate instance
that needs to pass
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113830/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and David Faure.
Repository: kdelibs
On Tuesday 12 November 2013 23:42:36 Alex Merry wrote:
The latter is my personal preference (and I don't see any real issue
with KDBusAddons optionally using something from Qt Essentials), but
what are other people's thoughts?
Could you explain why KDBusService has to care about the
On Nov. 12, 2013, 11:49 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
About the .colors translations, we have this
./kdeui/colors/kcolordialog.cpp:104:{ 40.colors,
I18N_NOOP2(palette name, Forty Colors) },
./kdeui/colors/kcolordialog.cpp:105:{ Oxygen.colors,
I18N_NOOP2(palette name,
On Wednesday 13 November 2013 06:38:44 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Tuesday 12 November 2013 23:42:36 Alex Merry wrote:
The latter is my personal preference (and I don't see any real issue
with KDBusAddons optionally using something from Qt Essentials), but
what are other people's thoughts?
Hi,
I'm currently trying to port kglobalaccel in kde-runtime to frameworks. I'm
facing an issue in the file globalshortcut.cpp: it tries to access the private
header of KGlobalShortcutInfo to create a custom KGlobalShortcutInfo
object[1]. Now this looks obviously wrong and doesn't work as the
60 matches
Mail list logo
