On Monday 06 January 2014 08:36:14 Christoph Cullmann wrote:
Is it really enough to init a new repository and have that one initial
commit + add (and then move the files around inside the new git) to have
history via grafting available? There is no other trick behind I just
don't see ATM?
Hi!
I have tried to build KF5 from scratch. When running ./kdesrc-build, I get
the following:
david@nimfa:~/devel/kf5-development$ ./kdesrc-build
Script started processing at Mon Jan 6 11:53:41 2014
* Downloading projects.kde.org project database...
Updating kde-build-metadata (to branch
On Monday 06 January 2014 12:03:26 David Gil Oliva wrote:
I have checked that
/home/david/devel/kf5-development/kde-build-metadata/dependency-data-common
doesn't exist.
Indeed; chicken and egg problem (I was waiting for kdesrc-build to support it
before moving stuff to it).
Created now, does
Hello,
On Monday 06 January 2014 09:33:38 Martin Graesslin wrote:
On Monday 06 January 2014 07:52:50 Kevin Ottens wrote:
The current list of modules is there:
http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List
As you can see there's quite some holes in the table, and quite a few
entries marked
I see, yeah, thats KatePart it seems to me.
Anyway, I am all for going to have a KF5 KTextEditor framework, will make it
more approachable
for other projects to use it.
And unlike in 4.x, KTextEditor would always provide the implementation
directly (KatePart merged in, internally)
and
Yes, it works.
Thanks!
David Gil
El 06/01/2014 13:49, David Faure fa...@kde.org va escriure:
On Monday 06 January 2014 12:03:26 David Gil Oliva wrote:
I have checked that
/home/david/devel/kf5-development/kde-build-metadata/dependency-data-common
doesn't exist.
Indeed; chicken and egg
On Monday 06 January 2014 23:54:46 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Monday 06 January 2014 22:26:27 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
IMO something like proposing the maintainers and approving them,
similar to Qt, would be good, i.e. at least some kind of
voting by who we will be governed.
Definitely
Am Montag, 6. Januar 2014, 21:44:46 schrieb Christoph Cullmann:
I see, yeah, thats KatePart it seems to me.
Anyway, I am all for going to have a KF5 KTextEditor framework, will make
it more approachable
for other projects to use it.
And unlike in 4.x, KTextEditor would always provide
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Kevin Funk k...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Montag, 6. Januar 2014, 21:44:46 schrieb Christoph Cullmann:
I see, yeah, thats KatePart it seems to me.
Anyway, I am all for going to have a KF5 KTextEditor framework, will
make
it more approachable
for other
