---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115863/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115584/
---
(Updated Feb. 18, 2014, 8:15 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115584/#review50130
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115695/#review50136
---
Ping, any comments?
- Martin Klapetek
On Feb. 13, 2014,
I'm getting a fail for kwidgetsaddons
Start 1: kimageformats-read-jp2
1/13 Test #1: kimageformats-read-jp2 ...***Failed0.21 sec
Only this test fails and only on i386, tried with the latest git. Any ideas?
Jonathan
___
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115496/#review50149
---
Overriding a CMake package like this will just cause all
On 18/02/14 15:06, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
I'm getting a fail for kwidgetsaddons
Start 1: kimageformats-read-jp2
1/13 Test #1: kimageformats-read-jp2 ...***Failed0.21 sec
Only this test fails and only on i386, tried with the latest git. Any ideas?
Odd. In terms
Hello everyone,
This is the minutes of the Week 8 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on
#kde-devel at 4pm Paris time.
Were present: afiestas, alexmerry, dfaure, mck182, mgraesslin, sebas,
svuorela, teo, tosky and myself.
Announcement:
* Alpha 1 is out;
* Get ready for alpha 2 end of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115496/#review50152
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115496/
---
(Updated Feb. 18, 2014, 3:26 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115658/#review50153
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Feb. 11, 2014, 1:30
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115869/
---
Review request for Build System, Extra Cmake Modules, KDE Frameworks, and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115496/#review50155
---
Ship it!
Looks great. Do you plan on a transition period of
On Feb. 18, 2014, 3:40 p.m., Sune Vuorela wrote:
Looks great. Do you plan on a transition period of more than a week?
No. In fact, my aim is to get it done today. The script is a simple sed
command.
- Alex
---
This is an
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115775/
---
(Updated Feb. 18, 2014, 3:49 p.m.)
Review request for Build System,
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 03:23:42PM +, Alex Merry wrote:
On 18/02/14 15:06, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
I'm getting a fail for kwidgetsaddons
Start 1: kimageformats-read-jp2
1/13 Test #1: kimageformats-read-jp2 ...***Failed0.21 sec
Only this test fails and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115869/
---
(Updated Feb. 18, 2014, 4:26 p.m.)
Review request for Build System,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115745/#review50166
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115745/
---
(Updated Feb. 18, 2014, 4:49 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115741/#review50168
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115741/#review50169
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115869/#review50170
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Faure
On Feb. 18, 2014, 4:26
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115869/#review50171
---
This review has been submitted with commit
If you have find modules that you think should go into
extra-cmake-modules 1.0.0, mention them in this email thread.
I would like to have a rule similar to the old kdelibs rule for classes:
at least two users, otherwise you may as well just put them in the
project's local cmake directory.
I did
El Dimarts, 18 de febrer de 2014, a les 18:32:01, Aaron Seigo va escriure:
Git commit be5ad03baf3fe327018742a114051377f8eea3c5 by Aaron Seigo.
Committed on 18/02/2014 at 18:30.
Pushed by aseigo into branch 'master'.
activities runner ported to Sprinter
can't fully test this one as the
See http://build.kde.org/job/kcoreaddons_master_qt5/27/
--
Started by remote host 127.0.0.1 with note: Triggered by commit
Building remotely on LinuxSlave - 1 in workspace
http://build.kde.org/job/kcoreaddons_master_qt5/ws/
Running Prebuild steps
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115874/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kcoreaddons
Description
See http://build.kde.org/job/kwidgetsaddons_master_qt5/25/
--
Started by remote host 127.0.0.1 with note: Triggered by commit
Building remotely on LinuxSlave - 1 in workspace
http://build.kde.org/job/kwidgetsaddons_master_qt5/ws/
Running Prebuild steps
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115610/#review50175
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115610/
---
(Updated Feb. 18, 2014, 8:59 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/
---
(Updated Feb. 18, 2014, 9:50 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115875/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kconfig
Description
Hi
I was just looking at knotification, and for some reason, KPassivePopup
is ended up here. I was quite surprised to see it there, as it is used
for 'popping up stuff' all over the place, and isn't really notification
specific.
Shouldn't it rather be in kwidgets?
/Sune
- hoping for a widgets
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote:
Hi
I was just looking at knotification, and for some reason, KPassivePopup
is ended up here. I was quite surprised to see it there, as it is used
for 'popping up stuff' all over the place, and isn't really notification
On Tuesday 18 February 2014 23:21:53 Sune Vuorela wrote:
Hi
I was just looking at knotification, and for some reason,
KPassivePopup is ended up here. I was quite surprised to see it
there, as it is used for 'popping up stuff' all over the place,
and isn't really notification specific.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115876/
---
Review request for Build System, Documentation and KDE Frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115879/
---
Review request for Documentation and KDE Frameworks.
Repository:
On 18/02/14 22:46, Christoph Feck wrote:
On Tuesday 18 February 2014 23:21:53 Sune Vuorela wrote:
Hi
I was just looking at knotification, and for some reason,
KPassivePopup is ended up here. I was quite surprised to see it
there, as it is used for 'popping up stuff' all over the place,
and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115876/#review50181
---
Does this have any other users than kdoctools? If not, it
On Feb. 18, 2014, 11:13 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
Does this have any other users than kdoctools? If not, it should probably
just move to that module. Even if kde4support ends up using it, I don't
view that as a reason to put it in ECM.
There are no other use apart from kdoctools and
On 18/02/14 18:09, Alex Merry wrote:
If you have find modules that you think should go into
extra-cmake-modules 1.0.0, mention them in this email thread.
I would like to have a rule similar to the old kdelibs rule for classes:
at least two users, otherwise you may as well just put them in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115832/
---
(Updated Feb. 19, 2014, 7 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115832/#review50192
---
This review has been submitted with commit
43 matches
Mail list logo
