And what is the problem depending on e-c-m? It's the base package, which will
be available everywhere and being a part of KDE frameworks will make our
libraries more visible and connected to KDE. We should be definitely part of
frameworks, like Solid. Well, libnm-qt/libmm-qt are basically
Hi,
similar as to what we already have with DrKonqi moving kglobalacceld from kde-
runtime into the globalaccel framework would significantly raise the tier and
dependencies. At the moment KGlobalAccel is a tier1 framework.
The runtime component though depends on:
* KF5::GlobalAccel
*
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
similar as to what we already have with DrKonqi moving kglobalacceld from
kde-
runtime into the globalaccel framework would significantly raise the tier
and
dependencies. At the moment KGlobalAccel is a tier1
On Friday 04 April 2014 16:06:32 Aleix Pol wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
similar as to what we already have with DrKonqi moving kglobalacceld from
kde-
runtime into the globalaccel framework would significantly raise the tier
and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117131/#review54998
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
src/lib/util/kuser_win.cpp
Hello,
On Friday 04 April 2014 16:10:23 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
In that case, I'd suggest moving it to plasma-workspace, but then we'll
have to make sure to make it explicit that KGlobalAccel is not a portable
framework, rendering components depending on it not portable (with
emphasis on
2014-04-04 11:10 GMT-03:00 Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org:
On Friday 04 April 2014 16:06:32 Aleix Pol wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
similar as to what we already have with DrKonqi moving kglobalacceld from
kde-
runtime into the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117078/
---
(Updated April 4, 2014, 9:01 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117078/
---
(Updated April 4, 2014, 9:20 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117376/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and kdewin.
Repository: kded
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117131/#review55008
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117131/
---
(Updated April 5, 2014, 1:32 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
12 matches
Mail list logo