Hi all,
I was looking into my frameworks, to prepare them for the 5.0. One thing was
looking into was the deprecation defines. In KConfig, there are a couple of
defines to disable deprecated functions:
- KDE_NO_DEPRECATED
- KCONFIGCORE_NO_DEPRECATED
- KCONFIGGUI_NO_DEPRECATED
Where
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117985/#review57287
---
IIRC that was intentional as to not have kjs depend on
On May 4, 2014, 10 p.m., Commit Hook wrote:
This review has been submitted with commit
73992f139276b75aeddf78f476644a2d82f9e802 by Alex Merry on behalf of
Aurélien Gâteau to branch master.
Thanks for committing. Note that I do intend to improve the unit tests, was
just busy with other
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 6:36 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
[Cross posting against my will...]
On Sunday 04 May 2014 16:27:44 Luigi Toscano wrote:
I understand that the big concern was about the testing: stable branches
did
not receive the same attention
This is not the main
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Martin Graesslin mgraess...@kde.org wrote:
On Saturday 03 May 2014 23:56:53 Valorie Zimmerman wrote:
I know I said
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Valorie Zimmerman
valorie.zimmer...@gmail.com wrote:
Time is short, so this is the last time I'll write. Think
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117946/
---
(Updated May 5, 2014, 9:39 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117946/#review57294
---
This review has been submitted with commit
See http://build.kde.org/job/ktexteditor_master_qt5/397/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117997/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Chusslove Illich.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118000/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118001/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Chusslove Illich.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118002/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Christoph Feck.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118003/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: frameworkintegration
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118002/
---
(Updated May 5, 2014, 6:14 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118000/#review57332
---
Hmm... I think we still want these in a versioned directory.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118003/#review57334
---
I don't think we want to do this. The is the framework
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118000/
---
(Updated May 5, 2014, 7:02 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
On May 5, 2014, 6:51 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
I don't think we want to do this. The is the framework integration plugin
for KF5, so putting it in a KF5 directory makes sense (note that there are
a bunch of other framework plugins that should be put back in a versioned
subdirectory - I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118002/
---
(Updated May 5, 2014, 7:05 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118003/
---
(Updated May 5, 2014, 7:07 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118004/
---
Review request for Documentation, KDE Frameworks and Luigi Toscano.
Hello all,
After the release of beta 2, we realized that it couldn't be the last beta for
several reasons:
* a long standing release blocker in libsolid still wasn't addressed in time
for beta 2, it'll hopefully be solved in the next few days, otherwise we'll
put in place a contingency plan;
On Sunday, May 04, 2014 16:27:44 Luigi Toscano wrote:
Kevin Ottens ha scritto:
So, we had a team discussion here with Albert, Aleix, Alex, Alex,
Aurélien,
David, Rohan and myself. We juggled with several options, trying to
address
the following constraints:
* We don't have many
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118000/#review57350
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Alex Merry
On May 5, 2014, 5:02 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118003/#review57351
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Alex Merry
On May 5, 2014, 5:07 p.m.,
On 05/05/14 19:57, Kevin Ottens wrote:
Hello all,
After the release of beta 2, we realized that it couldn't be the last beta
for
several reasons:
* a long standing release blocker in libsolid still wasn't addressed in time
for beta 2, it'll hopefully be solved in the next few days,
See http://build.kde.org/job/kde-baseapps_frameworks_qt5/13/changes
Changes:
[arichardson.kde] Allow compiling Dolphin with KF5
[arichardson.kde] KParts::ReadOnlyPart::openUrl() changed from KUrl parameter
to QUrl
[arichardson.kde] completely disable QAccessible for now, since it causes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118003/#review57357
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118003/
---
(Updated May 5, 2014, 9:21 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118000/#review57359
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118000/
---
(Updated May 5, 2014, 9:28 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118001/#review57360
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Chusslove Illich
On May 5, 2014, 6:02
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117997/#review57361
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Chusslove Illich
On May 5, 2014, 5:03
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118001/#review57362
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118004/#review57363
---
Is the po-off directory really needed in the example?
On May 4, 2014, 2:21 p.m., Burkhard Lück wrote:
I used this table to check your RR:
kdoctools/src/customization/
kdoctools/common/ Status with RR 117964
af/entities/underGPL.docbook:2:type=commondoc url=gpl-translated.html
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117964/
---
(Updated May 6, 2014, 1:19 a.m.)
Review request for Documentation and
37 matches
Mail list logo
