On Tuesday, June 3, 2014 00:11:51 Mark Gaiser wrote:
We should do this as a gsoc project. Since this would be very
unless it is a very gifted student, this is almost certainly outside the realm
of reason for a GSoC project.
--
Aaron J. Seigo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118458/#review59377
---
Ship it!
I guess you used QFile::link wrongly in your
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118566/#review59379
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118566/
---
(Updated June 6, 2014, 8:02 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Monday, June 2, 2014 20:54:11 Mark Gaiser wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
On Thursday, May 29, 2014 16:32:28 Mark Gaiser wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Aaron J. Seigo ase
But don't you just move logic to the slave that way?
yes and
On June 5, 2014, 10:22 p.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
Thanks Martin for looking at the issue.
Just one question: Is plasmashell the only application which needs to
include the additional search path, or does every application wanting a
tray icon call the addAppDir() function? I am bit
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
On Monday, June 2, 2014 20:54:11 Mark Gaiser wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
On Thursday, May 29, 2014 16:32:28 Mark Gaiser wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Aaron J.
On June 5, 2014, 10:22 p.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
src/kiconloader.h, line 209
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118561/diff/1/?file=279078#file279078line209
Are we still allowed to break binary compatibility? If not, please
create a separate call.
Martin Klapetek wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118564/#review59415
---
src/core/kconfig.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118564/
---
(Updated June 6, 2014, 1:33 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118564/#review59416
---
This change seems to break the KConfigTest::testMerge()
-
On June 6, 2014, 1:37 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
This change seems to break the KConfigTest::testMerge()
well not really, it depends on the locale whether it breaks. If I switch to en
it succeeds.
- Martin
---
This is an
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118564/
---
(Updated June 6, 2014, 1:43 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118561/#review59425
---
Ship it!
Only for the documentation. We abbreviate in code
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118561/
---
(Updated June 6, 2014, 12:31 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118561/#review59426
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118458/#review59456
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118458/
---
(Updated June 6, 2014, 3:33 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118458/#review59457
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118458/
---
(Updated June 6, 2014, 3:33 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
See http://build.kde.org/job/kcoreaddons_master_qt5/104/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117974/
---
(Updated June 6, 2014, 7:15 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
On May 12, 2014, 3:16 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
examples/bzip2gzip/main.cpp, line 74
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117974/diff/1/?file=271400#file271400line74
Maybe a better idea to use a loop to avoid the readAll? I know that's
an example which needs to be kept simple, but
On Saturday 10 May 2014 10:28:43 Alex Merry wrote:
Git commit 7213137a75e832976c25168ae640d26369c771a7 by Alex Merry.
Committed on 10/05/2014 at 10:26.
Pushed by alexmerry into branch 'master'.
Revert use the NAME_PREFIX only for the test, not for the executable
I didn't follow the full
On 06/06/14 20:29, David Faure wrote:
On Saturday 10 May 2014 10:28:43 Alex Merry wrote:
Git commit 7213137a75e832976c25168ae640d26369c771a7 by Alex Merry.
Committed on 10/05/2014 at 10:26.
Pushed by alexmerry into branch 'master'.
Revert use the NAME_PREFIX only for the test, not for the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118452/#review59479
---
Interestingly, I had a benchmark to compare a number of data
On June 6, 2014, 10:34 p.m., David Faure wrote:
Interestingly, I had a benchmark to compare a number of data structures for
UDSEntry (which made me turn the Qt3 QList into the Qt4 QHash). That
benchmark is the commented-out newApiPerformance() method in jobtest.cpp.
I just extended
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118564/#review59483
---
Ship it!
Excellent, thanks! Just a couple minor things,
28 matches
Mail list logo
