On June 14, 2014, 11:36 a.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
src/core/kconfigdata.h, line 68
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118692/diff/2/?file=280489#file280489line68
i didn't bother to re-read the whole code, so maybe that's why i can't
claim to understand how that is supposed to
Hi Albert,
On 08 Jun 2014, at 20:47 , Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
...but the build runs fine anyways.
Right, that's because they are optional :)
I know. ;)
Actually all the combinations should be tested,
I thought so.
Well, I guess I won’t invest too much time in stg like this,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118498/
---
(Updated June 15, 2014, 4:13 p.m.)
Review request for Build System,
On June 12, 2014, 11:06 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
What's the use case? Didn't we have a different way for translating ui
files?
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
What's the use case?
well as explained in the comment for translating dynamically loaded UI
files. Where is that
On June 12, 2014, 11:06 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
What's the use case? Didn't we have a different way for translating ui
files?
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
What's the use case?
well as explained in the comment for translating dynamically loaded UI
files. Where is that
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118768/#review60146
---
Ship it!
Thanks. Actually I wouldn't mind if KIO and KConfig
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118716/
---
(Updated June 16, 2014, 12:45 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118716/
---
(Updated June 16, 2014, 12:57 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118716/
---
(Updated June 16, 2014, 12:58 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks,
