---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120449/#review67795
---
Ship it!
Looks good
src/kstatusnotifieritem.cpp
On Oct. 1, 2014, 6:57 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
Isn't that blocking? Do we know when it's called?
David Edmundson wrote:
yes it is.
but it's a static method and there is no change signal. There isn't
really any other option (without changing Qt).
What if we make it the
On Oct. 1, 2014, 4:57 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
Isn't that blocking? Do we know when it's called?
David Edmundson wrote:
yes it is.
but it's a static method and there is no change signal. There isn't
really any other option (without changing Qt).
Martin Klapetek wrote:
On Oct. 1, 2014, 6:57 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
Isn't that blocking? Do we know when it's called?
David Edmundson wrote:
yes it is.
but it's a static method and there is no change signal. There isn't
really any other option (without changing Qt).
Martin Klapetek wrote:
On Oct. 1, 2014, 4:57 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
Isn't that blocking? Do we know when it's called?
David Edmundson wrote:
yes it is.
but it's a static method and there is no change signal. There isn't
really any other option (without changing Qt).
Martin Klapetek wrote:
On Oct. 1, 2014, 6:57 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
Isn't that blocking? Do we know when it's called?
David Edmundson wrote:
yes it is.
but it's a static method and there is no change signal. There isn't
really any other option (without changing Qt).
Martin Klapetek wrote:
On Oct. 1, 2014, 4:57 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
Isn't that blocking? Do we know when it's called?
David Edmundson wrote:
yes it is.
but it's a static method and there is no change signal. There isn't
really any other option (without changing Qt).
Martin Klapetek wrote:
On Oct. 2, 2014, 7:10 a.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
src/kstatusnotifieritem.cpp, line 820
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120449/diff/2/?file=315991#file315991line820
I would merge it with the if (enabled... above, there's no point going
forward from there if we're going to
On Oct. 2, 2014, 9:10 a.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
src/kstatusnotifieritem.cpp, line 820
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120449/diff/2/?file=315991#file315991line820
I would merge it with the if (enabled... above, there's no point going
forward from there if we're going to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120243/
---
(Updated Oct. 2, 2014, 2:25 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120450/
---
(Updated Oct. 2, 2014, 2:26 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Oct. 1, 2014, 4:57 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
Isn't that blocking? Do we know when it's called?
David Edmundson wrote:
yes it is.
but it's a static method and there is no change signal. There isn't
really any other option (without changing Qt).
Martin Klapetek wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120449/
---
(Updated Oct. 2, 2014, 2:29 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
Valorie,
I'm a bit confused. books.kde.org says the book is hosted at
flossmanuals, but that url takes me to the oldish KDE Dev Guide is
thi Frameworks Cookbook a different thing than that old book, right?
Is the current wip book available somewhere ? I guess if so we should
point that link at it
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120467/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Frederik Gladhorn.
Bugs: 334963
hi all,
I guess its a question to Qt experts or possibly low level KF5 experts.
When comparing debugging outputs when running app + style against Qt4
and Qt5, I've noticed the following significant difference.
In Qt4, as far as I can tell, QStyle was only instanciated one per QApp,
and
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Hugo Pereira Da Costa hugo.pere...@free.fr
wrote:
hi all,
I guess its a question to Qt experts or possibly low level KF5 experts.
When comparing debugging outputs when running app + style against Qt4 and
Qt5, I've noticed the following significant
17 matches
Mail list logo