---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122313/#review77724
---
Ship it!
- David Faure
On Jan. 29, 2015, 6:54 p.m., Hrvoje
On March 19, 2015, 12:23 a.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
I'm all for getting rid of the Nepomuk code. However, I'm not too sure
about the strigi part. That should still work.
It does not ;-)
Originally, this review added back the find_package(Strigi) call which was
removed a while back (at
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122313/
---
(Updated March 19, 2015, 11:18 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123075/#review3
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jeremy Whiting
On March 19, 2015,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123075/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Michael Palimaka.
Repository:
alohas
While investigating a wall of build failures in the kubuntu ci this
morning I stumbled upon a very interesting problem.
Problem tldr: target A links library B, A doesn't get the includes of
link libraries of B by default. e.g. A links B, B links karchive, A
doesn't have access to the
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Harald Sitter sit...@kde.org wrote:
alohas
While investigating a wall of build failures in the kubuntu ci this
morning I stumbled upon a very interesting problem.
Problem tldr: target A links library B, A doesn't get the includes of
link libraries of B by
Hello Aleix Pol Gonzalez, David Faure,
I'd like you to do a code review. Please visit
https://gerrit.vesnicky.cesnet.cz/r/432
to review the following change.
Change subject: Consolidate find_package calls
..
Consolidate
