---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123216/#review78389
---
hmm just wondering: why does it need to be a QApplication?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123223/#review78424
---
Good catch, maybe we can use QFileInfo::completeBaseName()
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Alex Merry alex.me...@kde.org wrote:
On Wednesday 01 April 2015 21:39:45 Alex Merry wrote:
This appears to be a regression with the 3.0 branch of CMake. 2.8.12 doesn't
have an issue, and neither does 3.1.3.
For reference:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123095/
---
(Updated April 2, 2015, 12:41 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
I have no particular objection,
So, what needs to be done to get this synced up? Bump the version in
the CMakeLists.txt and update some release-tarball-creating script?
David I guess the latter is for you?
Thanks,
Steve.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123223/
---
(Updated April 2, 2015, 11:55 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
On March 30, 2015, 9:33 p.m., Gilles Caulier wrote:
yes. libkipi is fully ported to KF5.
Kipi-plugins is partially ported (only 6 tools). It's enough to test.
https://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Digikam/CodingSprint2014
I explicitly did `./kdesrc-build libkipi libkexiv2 libkdcraw
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123223/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kservice
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123229/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kio
Description
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122981/
---
(Updated April 2, 2015, 2:56 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122981/#review78410
---
I finally managed to make most the master unit tests pass:
On March 22, 2015, 3:56 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
src/kglobalaccel.h, line 260
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122981/diff/2/?file=356138#file356138line260
typo in following
Gregor Mi wrote:
About why it is needed: see
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/
---
(Updated April 2, 2015, 4:48 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
13 matches
Mail list logo