---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125259/
---
(Updated Sept. 30, 2015, 5:39 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125259/#review86140
---
Only going to push the autotest change now that the Thomas's p
El Dissabte, 26 de setembre de 2015, a les 15:41:09, David Edmundson va
escriure:
> Do it.
> No point having options that do nothing, and I haven't noticed any
> complaints about this function.
Removed from the KCM and from gwenview.
Cheers,
Albert
>
> David
___
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125309/
---
(Updated Sept. 29, 2015, 9:21 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been m
> On Sept. 28, 2015, 7:30 vorm., David Faure wrote:
> > The filename not matching the servicetype name in it, is very confusing.
> >
> > How about deprecating KonqPopupMenu/Plugin, introducing a
> > KIOServiceMenuPlugin servicetype, installing desktop files for both,
> > querying for both
On Tuesday September 29 2015 09:45:02 David Faure wrote:
>> > One thing I like about this, as a side effect, is that my unittests which
>> > need to
>> > have control over *global* QSP paths (which I do by setting XDG_DATA_DIRS
>> > but I have to skip such unittests on OSX/Windows) could then be
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125390/
---
(Updated Sept. 29, 2015, 1:10 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been m
On Tuesday September 29 2015 09:45:02 David Faure wrote:
Hi,
I appreciate your continued interest (and not having to send a 'bump' message
:))
>You don't *really* need XDG on OSX. You need files to be found, it's just
>easier to do that by coying what we do on Linux/BSD ;)
Sure. But if it was
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125449/#review86103
---
Ship it!
+1, will be needed to have realiable task icons in w
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125449/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks, David Faure and Marco Martin.
Reposito
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120228/
---
(Updated Sept. 29, 2015, 9:34 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been d
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125309/#review86093
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Martin Gräßlin
On Sept. 28, 2015, 5:45
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125237/
---
(Updated Sept. 29, 2015, 7:34 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125238/
---
(Updated Sept. 29, 2015, 7:34 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been m
On Monday 15 June 2015 22:23:17 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Hi,
> One would need a need runtime version information of particular kf5
> libraries -- in addition to version with which the software has been
> built.
>
> It seems that mostly Plasma and KActivities have equivalent of runtime
> version i
On Friday 25 September 2015 14:09:14 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> Also, it strikes me as bit of a gamble not to have implemented a framework
> for dealing with what one might call Freedesktop or XDG compliance, but to
> have left that to QStandardPaths, basically. It must have been clear from the
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
