---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126724/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks, Dario Freddi and David Edmundson.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126712/
---
(Updated Jan. 12, 2016, 8:12 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126723/#review90956
---
Patch looks good - normally I would say that the build-deps
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126723/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks, David Edmundson, Hrvoje Senjan, and
> On Jan. 12, 2016, 10:43 a.m., Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> > Patch looks good - normally I would say that the build-deps need to be
> > bumped to request an appropriate Polkit version (0.113), but e.g. Debian
> > backports this change to the older 0.105 release - and that seems to be
> > quite
> On Jan. 12, 2016, 10:43 a.m., Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> > Patch looks good - normally I would say that the build-deps need to be
> > bumped to request an appropriate Polkit version (0.113), but e.g. Debian
> > backports this change to the older 0.105 release - and that seems to be
> > quite
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126692/
---
(Updated Jan. 12, 2016, 8:12 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126696/
---
(Updated Jan. 12, 2016, 8:12 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
> On Jan. 12, 2016, 10:43 a.m., Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> > Patch looks good - normally I would say that the build-deps need to be
> > bumped to request an appropriate Polkit version (0.113), but e.g. Debian
> > backports this change to the older 0.105 release - and that seems to be
> > quite
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126727/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Plasma.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126725/#review90980
---
Can I see the backtrace, with a description of how this gets
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126624/
---
(Updated Jan. 12, 2016, 10:40 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Software on
> On Jan. 12, 2016, 10:43 a.m., Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> > Patch looks good - normally I would say that the build-deps need to be
> > bumped to request an appropriate Polkit version (0.113), but e.g. Debian
> > backports this change to the older 0.105 release - and that seems to be
> > quite
GENERAL INFO
BUILD UNSTABLE
Build URL:
https://build.kde.org/job/kio%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/206/
Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc
Date of build: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 12:07:33 +
Build duration: 7 min 21 sec
CHANGE SET
Revision f7b58166bd9cd5957534af65f10bb9bb7f897e2d
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126725/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Christoph Feck.
Repository:
> On Jan. 12, 2016, 10:43 a.m., Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> > Patch looks good - normally I would say that the build-deps need to be
> > bumped to request an appropriate Polkit version (0.113), but e.g. Debian
> > backports this change to the older 0.105 release - and that seems to be
> > quite
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126723/#review90970
---
core/polkitqt1-subject.cpp (line 184)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126724/#review90973
---
Ship it!
As long as the additional dependency does not cause
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126724/#review90971
---
Ship it!
looks good, thanks for this patch.
note given my
GENERAL INFO
BUILD SUCCESS
Build URL:
https://build.kde.org/job/kio%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/207/
Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc
Date of build: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 22:26:10 +
Build duration: 5 min 37 sec
CHANGE SET
No changes
JUNIT RESULTS
Name: (root)
GENERAL INFO
BUILD SUCCESS
Build URL:
https://build.kde.org/job/kio%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/207/
Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc
Date of build: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 22:26:10 +
Build duration: 5 min 37 sec
CHANGE SET
No changes
JUNIT RESULTS
Name: (root)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126727/#review90976
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Edmundson
On Jan. 12, 2016,
> On Jan. 12, 2016, 10:49 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Can I see the backtrace, with a description of how this gets triggered? I'm
> > not sure the issue is fully understood (as shown by the use of "might" in
> > the description...).
> >
> > Is the action being destroyed by clicking into a
I'm about to write a class to handle favicons in a KIO library, rather than
using DBus
communication to a (currently kded, could be kiod otherwise) module.
I think there just isn't any point in using a central DBus module to handle a
shared cache
when a lock file can do the job.
The question
Hi,
I think there are many more features in KIO that aren't really
widget-dependant, so +1 for that, though we probably cannot move them anymore
now.
Cheers,
Kai Uwe
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:33 AM, David Faure wrote:
> I'm about to write a class to handle favicons in a KIO library, rather than
> using DBus
> communication to a (currently kded, could be kiod otherwise) module.
>
> I think there just isn't any point in using a central DBus
26 matches
Mail list logo