kfunk edited reviewers, added: Frameworks; removed: Framework: Syntax
Hightlighting.
BRANCH
find-cmake-binary
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3568
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: obogdan, kfunk, #frameworks
Cc: kfunk
kfunk requested changes to this revision.
kfunk added a reviewer: kfunk.
kfunk added inline comments.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
INLINE COMMENTS
> kfiledialog.cpp:607
> +if (d->native) {
> +return;
> +}
Should we rather check for `!d->w` here and below? Would
kfunk added a reviewer: Frameworks.
REPOSITORY
R241 KIO
BRANCH
master
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3586
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: vonreth, sandsmark, kfunk, leinir, #frameworks
Cc: kfunk, leinir, mutlaqja
kfunk added a reviewer: Frameworks.
REPOSITORY
R216 Syntax Highlighting
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3691
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfunk, #frameworks
kfunk updated this revision to Diff 9048.
kfunk added a comment.
Add generator
REPOSITORY
R216 Syntax Highlighting
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3691?vs=9047&id=9048
BRANCH
master
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3691
AFFECTED FILES
data/gener
kfunk added a comment.
> Here's the other problem: it's possible for threads to simply disappear on
Windows. Given that I see "dllmain" in the backtrace (though not DllMain), I
can't rule out that this has happened. Qt 5.6 has a workaround to another
deadlock caused by Windows. Can you try t
kfunk added a comment.
For the record, since I don't see an easy fix I'm pondering about patching
qtbase in craft.git:
Ideas:
a ) Add this to QDBusConnectionManager ctor:
qAddPostRoutine([]() {
QMetaObject::invokeMethod(QDBusConnectionManager::instance(), "quit");
kfunk added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D2545#69091, @thiago wrote:
> There doesn't seem to be a way of doing some clean up before the threads
are forcibly killed.
>
> Maybe if I abuse qtmain().
This would only fix it for non-console GUI applications if I underst
kfunk added a reviewer: Frameworks.
REPOSITORY
R237 KConfig
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3702
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfunk, #frameworks
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit R237:e6c88f67e2cb: kconfig_compiler: Use nullptr in generated
code (authored by kfunk).
REPOSITORY
R237 KConfig
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3702?vs=9072&id=9075
REVISION DET
kfunk added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D2075#66751, @jonathans wrote:
> Agreed that would be more robust. In writing the patch I was seeking
consistency with those functions that already did the test, so those would also
need to be updated. Are there any situations where t
kfunk added a comment.
Bump
REPOSITORY
R216 Syntax Highlighting
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3691
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfunk, #frameworks
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit R216:c3fc1271d6ad: Update QMake syntax highlighting file
(authored by kfunk).
CHANGED PRIOR TO COMMIT
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3691?vs=9048&id=9163#toc
REPOSITORY
R216 Syntax Highlighting
CHANGES
kfunk added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D2545#69298, @thiago wrote:
> In https://phabricator.kde.org/D2545#69187, @kfunk wrote:
>
> > In https://phabricator.kde.org/D2545#69091, @thiago wrote:
> >
> > > There doesn't seem to be a way of doing some clean up before the
kfunk added a comment.
Windows: We have working gperf recipe in Craft => we're fine.
QtWebKit already had an (optional) dependency on gperf.
REPOSITORY
R240 Extra CMake Modules
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3830
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings
kfunk added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> krearrangecolumnsproxymodel.cpp:44
> +
> +const int cc = d_ptr->m_sourceColumns.size();
> +
Please no short hand variable names.
`cc` -> `sourceColCount`?
REPOSITORY
R275 KItemModels
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3548
EMAI
kfunk added a reviewer: dfaure.
REPOSITORY
R275 KItemModels
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3548
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: lepagevalleeemmanuel, #frameworks, dfaure
Cc: kfunk, ltoscano
kfunk requested changes to this revision.
kfunk added a reviewer: kfunk.
kfunk added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
This flag is only needed for Ninja, correct? Thus please check for Ninja in
`CMAKE_GENERATOR ` before adding the compiler flag.
REPOSITORY
R240 Extr
kfunk accepted this revision.
kfunk added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM
REPOSITORY
R240 Extra CMake Modules
BRANCH
ninja-colors
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3733
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpref
kfunk added a reviewer: Frameworks.
REPOSITORY
R240 Extra CMake Modules
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3850
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfunk, #frameworks
kfunk added a reviewer: ivan.
REPOSITORY
R240 Extra CMake Modules
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3850
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfunk, #frameworks, ivan
kfunk added a comment.
Note: Just refreshing my complete KF5 build to test the change.
kactivities fails:
/home/kfunk/devel/src/kf5/kactivities/autotests/common/test.h:143:25:
error: token is not a valid binary operator in a preprocessor subexpression
#if defined(Q_NO_DEBUG) or
kfunk added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D3850#72077, @elvisangelaccio wrote:
> What about adding a way (cmake variable?) to opt-in if one wants to use the
alternative operators? Personally I like and use them whenever I start
something from scratch...
Hmm... You cou
kfunk added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D3850#72308, @rakuco wrote:
> Isn't it better to use `check_cxx_compiler_flag` to see if the flag is
supported and enable it in case it is?
-fno-operator-names is an ancient compiler flag, supported by GCC since at
least 2000
kfunk added a comment.
Note: I'll push this after the imminent KF5 release if no-one objects.
REPOSITORY
R240 Extra CMake Modules
BRANCH
master
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3850
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfun
kfunk accepted this revision.
kfunk added a reviewer: kfunk.
kfunk added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Rest LGTM, but let's wait for another review
INLINE COMMENTS
> kdynamicjobtrackernowidgetstest.cpp:34
> +public:
> +virtual void start() { QTimer::singleSho
kfunk updated the summary for this revision.
REPOSITORY
R241 KIO
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3987
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfunk, #frameworks
kfunk created this revision.
kfunk added a reviewer: Frameworks.
kfunk set the repository for this revision to R241 KIO.
Restricted Application added a project: Frameworks.
REVISION SUMMARY
The full patch (all Frameworks ported to using nullptr instead of null
literals) changes around 9000 line
kfunk updated the summary for this revision.
REPOSITORY
R241 KIO
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3987
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfunk, #frameworks
kfunk added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> graesslin wrote in job.h:50
> Question: is this change API and ABI stable?
Definitely ABI stable, since default arguments are not part of the function
signature.
I'm not aware this could break API compat either (well, only in case the
compiler co
501 - 530 of 530 matches
Mail list logo