kkofler added a comment.
If you ask me (there are 2 Kevins on this bug), I think this will work. I
think it's kinda overkill (it pretty much defeats the point of having
version-specific libexecdirs if we end up renaming the binaries anyway), but if
it works (which should be the case), I'm OK
kkofler added a comment.
Herald added a subscriber: kde-frameworks-devel.
Ping? This has been stuck for over a year now.
REPOSITORY
R241 KIO
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D8810
To: kkofler, #frameworks, kfunk, cullmann
Cc: kde-frameworks-devel, dfaure, ngraham, broulik, kfu
kkofler added a comment.
And the historical reason the name was not suffixed is because the binary was
moved to a private libexec subdirectory to prevent conflicts. This worked fine
as long as `/usr/bin` did not end up in the search path (in particular, for the
whole 4.x series).
REPOSITORY
kkofler added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D8810#167568, @cullmann wrote:
> Yeah, that was done to be able to provide win/linux install bundles.
A GNU/Linux install bundle should have a reparented FHS-like tree, possibly
wrapped in an image file (Flatpak/Snap/AppImage
kkofler updated this revision to Diff 22338.
kkofler retitled this revision from "Do not look for kioslave binary in
applicationDirPath (#386859)" to "Do not look for kioslave binary in
applicationDirPath on *nix (#386859)".
kkofler edited the summary of this revision.
kkofler added a comment.
kkofler created this revision.
kkofler added a reviewer: Frameworks.
Restricted Application added a project: Frameworks.
REVISION SUMMARY
src/core/slave.cpp (Slave::createSlave): Do not look for the kioslave
binary in QCoreApplication::applicationDirPath(). In distribution
packages, this end
retain whoopsie (crash report sending to
> errors.ubuntu.com). As I mentioned, this needs dealing with in ubuntu since
> they essentially attach a UI to coredumps, so either that or drkonqi need
> disabling on their platform.
>
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
> The problem with the du
> On Juli 13, 2016, 12:43 nachm., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> > +1 to the idea
> >
> > However, will this mean we get this awful apport "something crashed, now or
> > in the past" tray icon in addition to Drkonqi?
>
> Harald Sitter wrote:
> yes. its upon ubuntu to make that go away though as
> On Juli 13, 2016, 10:15 nachm., Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > I am opposed to this change, because it spams downstream packagers with
> > crash bugs they are usually not qualified to fix. Those few distributions
> > that really do want to get the reports downstrea
packagers with crash
bugs they are usually not qualified to fix. Those few distributions that really
do want to get the reports downstream (e.g. RHEL) already explicitly disable
DrKonqi.
- Kevin Kofler
On Juli 13, 2016, 12:40 nachm., Harald Sitter wrote
construct
a QFileDialog OBJECT as the above commit does, you always get the ugly Qt-only
dialog! So it's a very bad idea to do that.
Kevin Kofler
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listi
11 matches
Mail list logo
