On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> On Friday, 12 June 2015 01:29:59 CEST, Scarlett Clark wrote:
>>
>> Question, is your Qt5.2 patched?
>
>
> I'm pretty sure that it was a vanilla build straight from git on CentOS 7
> back in December 2014.
>
> I have no idea what failure you sa
On Friday, 12 June 2015 01:29:59 CEST, Scarlett Clark wrote:
Question, is your Qt5.2 patched?
I'm pretty sure that it was a vanilla build straight from git on CentOS 7
back in December 2014.
I have no idea what failure you saw and I agree that "no patches" is a good
general approach, but I
On Friday, June 12, 2015 01:17:22 AM Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Hi,
> if you would like to check how well the KF5 builds cope with multiple Qt5
> versions, take a look at this page generated from the Zuul/Gerrit CI
> system:
>
> http://ci-logs.kde.flaska.net/matrix.html
>
> I am open for suggestions fo
Hi Jan,
On 12 Jun 2015, at 01:17 , Jan Kundrát wrote:
> http://ci-logs.kde.flaska.net/matrix.html
that looks really neat, indeed!
:-D
Congratulations,
Marko
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailma
Hi,
if you would like to check how well the KF5 builds cope with multiple Qt5
versions, take a look at this page generated from the Zuul/Gerrit CI
system:
http://ci-logs.kde.flaska.net/matrix.html
I am open for suggestions for service improvements, so if you have an idea
on how to make this
